From Deseret News archives:

Commuter rail too pricey for weakened economy

Published: Friday, Aug. 12, 2005 4:32 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Because commuter rail gives very little benefit at very great cost, it poses a great hazard to Utah and America. This year, the Deseret Morning News has published articles on more than a dozen staggering problems facing an economically weakened America. The times demand the highest caliber of fiscal stewardship, not the lowest as is the case in transportation planning. This is a dangerous time for wasteful experiments in socialized transportation with outdated trains.

The beginning segment of commuter rail will cost car-driving taxpayers nearly a billion dollars, enough for a major new freeway, a badly needed freeway makeover, like Bangerter, or two Legacy Highways, (at their pre-Sierra-Club-inflated price). It will not begin to reduce congestion till well after 2020. We can get more mobility improvement with many smart, modern, least-cost, and car-user-paid alternatives.

What's the best-data ridership prediction? The Federal Transit Administration's latest "New Riders" estimate is that it would add a minuscule 1/16th of 1 percent to regional trips and 3,232 new 2-way riders by 2025 (about 3,500 by 2030). Compare that to corridor car travel of 320,000 two-way trips daily in 2030.

What's the real cost? $582 million to build it and $310 million for 23-year operating subsidy, (farebox = 30 percent, DeLeuw Cather). That's $0.9 billion just for the north section and it's 1/16th of 1 percent of new trips.

Story continues below
For perspective, compare it to cost-performance data in the Wasatch Front Regional Council 2030 Long-Range Plan. For each 1 percent of travel on highways the cost is $250 million. This is the gold standard in transportation cost-benefit analysis. Car-user-paid highway spending is 58 times more cost-effective than trains.

What is the cost-effectiveness on a per-daily-rider basis? The FTA's cost per new boarding is $25.32 (earning it their lowest "low" ranking). This means that every time a new rider pays a nominal $3 fare to board the train, the car-driving taxpayer will fork over $22.32 subsidy. That's $44.64 per day and $937 monthly subsidy. (See www.publicpurpose.com. Look for the Jaguar photo for similar calculations.)

Will freeway travel times drop? Insignificant. Table 5.1 in the final environmental-impact statement shows no timesaving for most peak car trips in 2030. One in four peak drivers would save, perhaps, one minute. There would be no time saved for the vast majority of car trips in the corridor.

In sharp contrast, FTA statistics in Table 5.6 show two-way train riders getting two hours per day "user benefit."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

4A volleyball: Warriors top Flyers

I was at UVU last weekend and wanted to comment on a player that I enjoyed...

SLC council OKs gay rights policies

I think the Church made the right decision here, but I am sorry that they had...

Both parties disrespect Constitution

Hawaii SAID?? No, that is not what the Constitution means by PROVING it. And...

SCHOOL BOARDS decide on school curiculum...in each school district. That...

Alta's Ohai is Ms. Soccer 2009

Whats impossible is to get back to KSL afterward... I there an LDS ksl in...

What happened to kananb when they had the number 1 offense in 1a and got shut...

Just a correction-Davis defeated Hunter in the 2002 Quarterfinals. It is...

We would get over it when you stop trying to control everything around us....

You must be a part of that Obama crowd who believes everyone deserves...

Alta's Ohai is Ms. Soccer 2009

direct link from ksl...that must be G 101 the space gate to stardom!

Advertisements
Advertisement