From Deseret News archives:

Ready for recycled round of moralistic debates?

Published: Thursday, Aug. 4, 2005 7:02 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Some say that there are no real new ideas in politics, that old ones just get recycled, updated a bit.

Could that be true of politicians, too?

It seems like we are, after 20 years, again recycling moralist debates in the Utah Legislature.

The latest idea comes from Sen. Chris Buttars, R-West Jordan: Passing a new law requiring the teaching of "intelligent design" in Utah public schools as a counterweight, if you will, to teaching evolution.

Last session it was Rep. Peggy Wallace, R-West Jordan, who wanted to repeal Utah's no-fault divorce law, hoping that making divorce more difficult would result in fewer divorces, as couples reflected more seriously on what they were doing.

I'm no expert on what "intelligent design" means, but it sounds like the teaching of a philosophy that no matter what science may tell us, there is a supreme being that oversees that science.

While the philosophy may be catching on among the Christian right across the country, my point here is that it's been awhile since the Utah Legislature had these kinds of debates. Yes, we have abortion debates, or gun control debates. I'm talking here of moral debates like the old days.

Story continues below
It reminds me of Sen. Verl Asay, Rep. Frances Hatch Merrill and a few other "moralists" whose bills or resolutions captivated the media and public in the 1980s.

Asay, who has since passed away, almost yearly came up with some bill that would grab headlines and take hours of controversial floor debate.

Editorial cartoonists had a field day.

I remember one press conference Asay called to talk about a bill that would exempt parents from the then-Harmful Materials to Minors Act.

Asay and his conservative supporters asked if a non-relative could be criminally prosecuted for giving a child material, like Playboy or Penthouse magazines a judge or jury deemed harmful to a child, why a parent or step-parent should be exempt from doing the same.

One TV reporter badgered Asay, demanding to know if under his bill a dad could be sent to jail for leaving his Penthouse magazine out on the table where his 15-year-old son looked at it.

I recall a harried Sen. Lyle Hillyard, R-Logan, who is still in the Legislature, being chased down a Capitol hallway by one of Asay's anti-smut supporters waving a Penthouse magazine at Hillyard, demanding that he look at the pictures.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU is afraid to play in front of the media public every year and that is why...

Will one, just one of you AGW believers prove that the earth is warming!...

Wondered what 1 would do if given and oppurtunity to play a professional...

Letters: Fools in Washington

Like most people I am progressively sicker with the way congresses are...

Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies

I have explored Nutty Putty before as well as other caves around the State....

Ywa Zionz has it share of deaths but the difference is that Zions National...

Actually a lot of conservatives did NOT want this war and still don't....

All these Ute fans are setting themselves up to be humiliated. Oh, and by...

this is a senseless death that didn't have to happen. my heart goes out to...

Musicians leave audience in awe

The band was awesome!! Thank you, Caleb, for allowing a member of the Little...

Advertisements