From Deseret News archives:

Panel fears collapse of U.S. health system

Group that seeks solution visits S.L. to hear experts

Published: Friday, July 22, 2005 11:37 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Like a termite-infested wagon wheel, the American health care system is rolling along. But without intervention, when it breaks — and health and fiscal experts say it will if it follows its current course — it will be disastrous.

The congressionally created Citizens Health Care Working Group, charged with no less than recommending a health system that "works for all Americans" — is getting less attention than failed Clinton-era health reform efforts. But its work could impact the lives of virtually all Americans for decades to come, those experts say. And it's more likely to succeed because of the panel's nonpartisan approach.

Friday, the group met in Salt Lake City for one of five national meetings to hear from experts like Comptroller General David M. Walker and Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who helped create it. The messages were both dire and hopeful.

Walker, who leads the Government Accountability Office, called federal health spending "an unsustainable trend" that will break the economy if it's not reined in. "The federal government is on an imprudent and unsustainable path," he said. And the financial situation is "worse than advertised."

But while he pointed out that system needs a complete makeover, it will likely have to be incremental, with a plan behind it, he said.

Story continues below
Spending for health care makes up a large chunk of federal spending, about 15 percent, and it's rising faster than inflation and economic growth. Germany and France are the only other countries that spend more than 10 percent on health care.

By 2013, health expenditures are projected to equal 18.3 percent of gross domestic product.

In the meantime, the American health care system performs below par on key health measures such as life expectancy and preventable deaths, Walker said. Quality is uneven and many patients don't receive clinically proven effective treatment. Information technology isn't used widely, which would reduce medical errors and improve quality. And there are no uniform standards for care, something other speakers at the hearing said brings clearly better outcomes at lower cost.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

re: Vote Ron Paul | 10:32 p.m. Dec. 4, 2009 "but the PS department does...

Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil

Most of the problems come from the small, ignorant minority on both sides. It...

'Bama vs Texas in title game

Alabama, Texas & the BCS certainly aren't winning any fans with the bowls...

re: Digbads | 9:10 p.m. Dec. 4, 2009 Right. Its about fear, hate,...

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

re: Beck Serves His Purpose | 11:26 a.m. Dec. 7, 2009 Conservative...

It is hard for BYU to beat 3 ranked opponents in a year because Utah is...

The Las Vegas bowl pays a quater of a mil more than in San Diege. How does...

You know at the risk of legitimizing anon there was an interesting story the...

Living with children

Which is worse? Being told you can accomplish anything or to be brow-beaten...

Couple things. There are 5 MWC teams in the bowls, not 3. Hall is .500 in...

Advertisements