One of these reactions is situationally appropriate. The other is not. Laura Bush comes out (mildly, but comes out nonetheless) for condom use. Do we laugh, or do we cry? The first lady toured South Africa, Tanzania and Rwanda last week, standing up for her version of African women's rights. She pressed for an end to domestic violence and for new legal protections for African women all too often subjugated to violence and sexual abuse.
Bush visited HIV-positive mothers in South Africa who are working to de-stigmatize AIDS. Experts say Africa will make scant progress toward stemming its HIV/AIDS epidemic without persuading Africans, who are leery of even discussing the issue, to start talking publicly about it, to get tested and then to practice safe sex or no sex at all.
While meeting with these mothers, "Dr." Laura taught the women her version of the ABCs. ABC stands for Abstinence, Be faithful and the correct and consistent use of Condoms as a last resort.
Wait a minute. Did we hear right? A member of the Bush family, darling of evangelical Christians, advocating condom use (even if it is only as a last resort)? Mother of God, I must be having a flashback.
Consider the monumental weight of the moment. Conservatives concede condoms are crucial. But the Christian right likes its women pregnant (and some would say barefoot) and condoms are a form of birth control promulgated by the vile left. Doesn't that violate every biblical principle down to the non-Darwinian molecular level? All right, I admit the use of hyperbole. But here's why it's so tough to decide whether the proper response to Bush's support for condoms merits cheers or tears. It is truly evolutionary that she would advocate condom use, even if only as a last resort. It's the political equivalent of Right saying, "See, the Left was correct all along on sex education."
But the first two branches of her tripartite pitch are glaringly troubling, because they were delivered to precisely the wrong audience.
Weigh the facts about the African AIDS epidemic. There are several reasons why the disease's spread has been so vigorous and so swift. The first reason is the high rate of rape in some African countries. In South Africa, for example, government statistics show the rape rate in 2003-04 was 113.7 per 100,000. Among that country's 45 million citizens, one in nine is HIV-positive. By comparison, the U.S. rate of rape in the year 2000 (and the U.S. rate is higher than that in many other developed nations) was just more than 32 per 100,000.
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
- Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
- Letter: Utah newspapers need to cover both...
- Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich won't...
- In our opinion: Editorial: A study on...
- Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the...
56 - Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Debates should be about finding...
22 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
20 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
19 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
16






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments