From Deseret News archives:

Utah frugal as host of '04 convention

Leaders spent $200,000 less than projected for state legislators meeting

Published: Monday, July 11, 2005 11:45 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
As dozens of Utah legislators prepare to attend this August's annual convention of the National Conference of State Legislatures in Seattle, a financial review of last year's conference in Salt Lake City shows Utah lawmakers were tight-fisted in their partying expenses.

They raised and spent $200,000 less than originally anticipated. But what else would you expect from a bunch of conservatives?

"It's our nature here (in Utah) to be frugal," says Senate Majority Leader Pete Knudson, R-Brigham City, who served as co-chairman of the Legislature's NCSL Planning Committee, which raised the funds and organized the social events for the July 2004 convention.

The Utah Legislature was the official host. And as such, the host state originally was supposed to raise around $1 million — no small feat — to entertain and transport the estimated 5,000 legislators and guests visiting Salt Lake City.

In the past, hosting states appropriated taxpayer money for the large events, figuring such a convention brings in a lot more cash to the local economy than taxpayers are kicking out.

In fact, a financial report on Utah's 2004 national NCSL convention shows the event brought $6.5 million in direct benefit to the state.

Story continues below
But Utah lawmakers, led by former Utah House Speaker Marty Stephens, who just happened to be NCSL president last year, decided they would raise their share of the costs locally, from Utah businesses and lobbyists.

In the end, the Legislature, along with national sponsors who yearly contribute to the NCSL convention no matter where it is, raised just enough to cover the expenses — overall, around $784,000. That was well down from the original $1 million budget.

Besides the state's share, NCSL itself spent another $1 million in organizing the speakers and four-day meetings in the Salt Palace. The state's share was mainly for entertainment, transportation, child care and activities for legislators' spouses and kids.

And entertain, the local legislators did.

By all accounts, the teetotaling Utah legislators — around 80 percent are members of the LDS Church and don't drink alcohol — had a good time. They even spent $16,935.32 on beer and wine, the final report shows, although Utah legislators probably didn't drink much of it.

"The (visiting) legislators found Salt Lake City beautiful, clean and comfortable," says Knudson. "There were those who had worries — could they have a drink? They found out that those who chose to had no problem at all."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Real Champions

Nice article. RSL was the best team in MLS when it counted - during the...

I use my magic eightball instead of a stone.

Letters: Some contradictions

Yes, you have it exactly right!

"If our laws were stricter, we would have much less drunken driving" This...

We may opt out at first, but eventually, they will increase the number of...

2009 MLS Cup recap

to huh? at 8:03 - Clearly you care to read an article on soccer and comment....

Real Champions

agreed stu.. The mls has total parity. Anyone can win in any game. Luckily...

Real Champions

University of Utah Gymnastic national champions anyone?

Is talking about religion taboo?

We humans need to learn how to discuss and disagree without arguing....

Reagan much-beloved in Utah

I wasn't in Utah during the Reagan years. But he saved California's econmy,...

Advertisements