From Deseret News archives:

Energy bill could mean oil riches for area

Published: Thursday, June 30, 2005 10:57 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — A massive energy bill passed Tuesday by the U.S. Senate could eventually bring oil riches to eastern Utah, western Colorado and southwestern Wyoming.

Whether that happens in two years or 20 or at all will take more than an act of Congress, where the bill now moves for consideration.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 includes a provision introduced earlier this year by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and cosponsored by Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, that will authorize a program to accelerate development of oil shale and tar sand in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming — home to half the world's oil shale resources or an estimated 2.6 trillion barrels of oil.

The act also authorizes the Bureau of Land Management to lease land for the commercial development of the resources and to create a task force to grease commercial development.

Despite language to accelerate development, the legislation stops short of putting the effort on a fast track: An amendment negotiated by Hatch and Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo., was sought by conservationists worried that rushing into things sets up the region for another boom-and-bust economic cycle.

Story continues below
"Oil shale is a huge unknown in our energy future, and we should not rush into it," said Steve Smith of The Wilderness Society, noting that the technology used in retrieving oil from shale and tar sands is "expensive and unproven."

Bob Randall of Western Resource Advocates also praised the compromise, saying the technology was not yet in place to begin commercial production within the next year and a half. "We don't even know the results of experimental research yet, and pushing development that fast would have spelled another boom-bust disaster," he said.

Hatch said negotiations with Salazar created a broader consensus in the Senate for the oil shale legislation, and he predicted the House-Senate conference committee will actually accelerate the oil shale and tar sands beyond what the Senate proposed.

"I think the House will expand it," he said. "It is starting to dawn on people we have some real resources there. We are the Saudi Arabia of oil," noting that "if we go full blast and get the bureaucracy off its duff, we can be up and running in five years."

The amendment sets up an oil shale task force to study the fuel's potential and requires a comprehensive environmental impact statement on how oil shale might be developed on federal public lands.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

CNN is hardly raw news free of analysis and without bias.

Win in New Mexico good for Y?

Playing lousy is never good. If it were, BYU would have been a monster after...

Hall ties Detmer's record for wins

TCU's footballers aren't any better than BYU's or Utah's, but they are better...

2A: San Juan claims title

Hey all of you 2A teams and fans. Is San Juan so predictable? Im not sure....

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

BYU has been up and down under the watch of Bronco. IF I hear them say "its...

Jazz notes: Young bigs ride bench

Thank you Jerry Sloan for 20 years of coaching the Jazz. But it is time to...

Wounded Utes limp home

2004 was our year. 2008 was our year. 2009 looks to be TCU's year. I say...

True, football does make the most money and it has traditionally drawn the...

You summed it up perfectly -- also my reasons for voting ABB next year --...

Why add Sand Diego or UNLV? If you are adding programs becase they have been...

Advertisements
Advertisement