From Deseret News archives:

Who's to blame for hold up on a 4th seat for Utah?

Published: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:54 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Webb: Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, one of the most respected, powerful and capable leaders in Congress, has suggested a straightforward way to resolve two long-standing injustices. First, the District of Columbia deserves representation in the U.S. House (which represents the people), although not in the Senate (which represents the states, and D.C. is not a state). Second, Utah was literally robbed of a fourth House seat in the last redistricting fiasco.

So Davis is pushing Congress to give D.C. a seat (most certainly Democratic) and Utah an additional seat (most certainly Republican), which would keep the partisan proportions basically status quo.

One more seat in Congress means more clout for Utah. It means more representation on more key committees, more chances to obtain grants and funding, more chances to pass legislation important to Utah and to kill bad projects like the Goshute nuclear waste storage.

Unfortunately, Utah's House delegation has not been united on this issue. Reps. Chris Cannon and Rob Bishop have been enthusiastic supporters of Davis' approach. They attended the rollout press conference and signed on as original co-sponsors. Rep. Jim Matheson, by contrast, has been AWOL, mouthing lukewarm support for a fourth seat but doing nothing to help the effort.

Democratic support is needed to get this passed, so Matheson's indifference is hurtful.

Story continues below
Matheson and the Democrats are apparently scared of the Utah Legislature, worried that it would attempt to create four Republican districts. But they haven't sat down with legislative leaders and attempted to work out any sort of agreement.

Legislative leaders tell me that getting a fourth seat is a much higher priority for them than trying to redistrict Matheson out of existence. A number of options are available. The possibility needs to be explored of making the fourth seat an at-large seat, leaving the other three districts as is. Or, the old four-seat plan developed in the last redistricting process could be resurrected, a plan that was pretty favorable to Matheson, as I recall.

With a little negotiation, it wouldn't be hard at all to work this out to everyone's satisfaction. The reality is, Matheson is a popular congressman and capable campaigner who has shown he can win anywhere in Utah. Presently, the GOP/Demo ratio is 66/33. Moving to 75/25 wouldn't be all that bad for Republicans.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Beck, Hannity, and Limbaugh get the audience they deserve and vice versa. ...

I find the rule,very discriminitory. I am not gay, I don't understand what...

Celtics crush Jazz

I understand we were outmanned last night. However, this effort was awful....

Tavernari has matured

My advice to Jonathan is shoot it when they pass it to you as soon as you...

Maybe they should try drafting a shooting guard who can shoot from outside ....

The sad thing about it is that there are actually people out there that are...

12 Utes return to Texas

Thank you TCU and BYU. Your wanting to beat Utah so bad has to drive you...

Celtics crush Jazz

Play fes and koufos. Look to the future. It looks like we will have two...

Letters: Obama 'too busy'

Oh come on. Obama's a horrible president, but I couldn't care less which...

"We had the best soccer of any place in the state. There's no disputing...

Advertisements
Advertisement