From Deseret News archives:

Utah needs to overhaul method of paying legislators

Published: Thursday, June 23, 2005 7:05 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
This summer and fall the Legislative Compensation Commission will meet to again recommend how much and in what manner Utah's 104 part-time legislators should be paid.

As lawmakers take on tax reform this year, it's time to look at legislative reform as well. And pay is a big part of that.

I know it may not be popular, or even politically correct, to advocate a pay raise for politicians — especially politicians that some people love to criticize, like the Legislature. But the fact is, Utah legislators needs some help.

They need help in personal staff and constituent services. They need help in dealing with conflict of interest and ethics. And they need help in diversifying their ranks and in their pay.

What do we want in our part-time legislators? We want smart, motivated people who bring a wealth of ideas and skills to the 75-member House and 29-member Senate. We want to broadly represent the makeup of our state, not only in political preferences, but in gender, race, ethnicity, religion, age, income and life experiences.

Story continues below
If we find that, through the system we've set up, those serving in our Legislature are warped out of those broad categories, shouldn't we consider changing the system? (Hey, I'm not saying that legislators themselves are warped — I know some of you love that picture — but that the system is somehow warped that brings us the people we have.)

One small example: At a recent Tax Reform Task Force subcommittee, a legislator not on the committee was talking about various income tax proposals before the group. And he noted that it was no wonder that the subcommittee wasn't looking favorably on a tax plan that would cut taxes on lower-income people while raising the state income taxes on those who made more than $75,000 a year.

"Everyone up there makes more than $75,000 a year," he said with some disgust, nodding at the panel.

And you know what, he's probably right.

One reason for that is because regular working stiffs can't afford to serve in the Legislature. Many of the current lawmakers are well-to-do, retired, don't have paying jobs or have jobs where their bosses keep them on the payroll during the 45-day general sessions because the bosses want an employee in the Legislature for whatever reasons.

If you have to take vacation time or unpaid leave to serve in the Legislature, it's tough on you financially.

I recall that in the mid-1980s, one state senator told me that she knew the financial status of most of her colleagues, and there were 12 millionaires among the then-29 senators.

"How does that reflect our citizens?" she said sarcastically.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

No, students are NOT safe from predators. If a parent wants to make sure...

If you really think Mormon's are mainstream, you must not have paid attention...

I don't see the schools presidents voting to get rid of WYM or NM, even...

Big games keep UHSAA coffers full

why people complain about how football is covered by the media too much. when...

A little perspective is not a bad thing. Notice the Cougar's won loss record...

I actually was encouraged by some aspects of the game. Any Utah fan who has...

A story about Mormons as minorities? In this paper? Get over the "victim"...

she was an awesome woman someone i looked up to when i was younger she was...

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

Wow you just made one of the dumbest comments I've heard yet. Fire Bronco????...

Photos: A Royal welcome home

Re: Huh?, You like many other haters are probably oblivious to many obvious...

Advertisements
Advertisement