Tax cut? No thanks, Utahns say

Despite nearly record tax surpluses coming into state government, most Utahns don't want a tax cut next year, a new poll shows.

Rather, they want the money spent on current state programs, pollster Dan Jones & Associates found in a survey conducted for the Deseret Morning News and KSL-TV.

But if the tax surpluses "at this significant level" keep coming as the 2006 Legislature approaches next January, says House Speaker Greg Curtis, R-Sandy: "I'll be leaning toward a tax cut. This is really healthy revenue growth."

This past week, the Utah State Tax Commission said that the state is running a $162 million revenue surplus in the state's two main funds, which are used to pay for all kinds of things, from public and higher education to human services to public safety.

The state's transportation fund has another $11.25 million surplus, the commission said, with only another month to go in the state's fiscal year.

That's on top of an estimated $285 million in extra money that legislators reallocated in the current year's spending during their 2005 general session in February.

If these revenues hold up, the state could end fiscal 2005 on July 1 with nearly half a billion extra dollars. And if the cash cow continues to give, new surpluses will build throughout fiscal 2005-06 as well.

All that cash is good news, for it shows a rebounding and robust state economy, commission tax economists say.

But as of now, Utahns don't really want tax cuts next year, Jones found.

Sixty-three percent strongly or somewhat favor spending the extra money on state programs such as education, road construction and health care for the needy, Jones found in a survey conducted May 31-June 2.

Twenty-nine percent strongly or somewhat favor tax cuts, the survey shows.

Tammy Kikuchi, spokeswoman for Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., said Friday that for now Huntsman doesn't advocate a tax cut next year.

"We are hopeful" that the current surplus will be reflected in tax revenues starting July 1. "But we don't know."

From the current surplus, big chunks by law must go into two separate Rainy Day funds, leaving less on the table for lawmakers and Huntsman to divvy up in the 2006 Legislature, she noted.

Several legislators involved in the huge tax reform study being conducted this summer and fall have said before that with so much extra money coming into the state, tax reform should also include tax cuts. Otherwise, pressure will just build for state government to grow excessively, something some conservatives don't want.