From Deseret News archives:

Preferred drug list back in spotlight

Published: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 9:32 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A prescription drug purchase plan initially designed two years ago in an effort to reduce the state's burgeoning Medicaid costs is back on the drawing board.

Dr. David Sundwall, director of the state Department of Health, told the Legislature's head budget committee Tuesday that a "preferred drug list," or PDL, could save millions of dollars a year in prescription drug costs. Essentially, the PDL would create a registry of drugs doctors could prescribe to patients that would ideally encourage the prescribing of medications that often have been around longer but are as effective as the new and usually more expensive ones.

The department made its case during an interim meeting of the Executive Appropriations Committee, hoping to secure approval for an initial PDL on a few classes of drugs. The committee only heard testimony from supporters of the bill, although they plan to hear from opponents — including pharmaceutical representatives — next month.

Medicaid is the joint state/federal health insurance for the poor and disabled that is the third-largest insurance plan in Utah as well as the largest portion of the state's budget outside education funding.

Story continues below
While always anxious to find a way to curtail the costs of Medicaid, leaders remained skeptical about the proposal Tuesday. Primarily, they feared that it would create artificial market controls on prescription drugs and unfairly impact Medicaid patients, concerns which Sundwall dismissed.

"A PDL gets the best possible drugs into the patients' hands at the best possible price," he said.

Even with estimated reductions in drug costs, the Medicaid program and prescription drug costs will continue to rise, Sundwall said. But instead of annual increases that can exceed 10 percent, the prescription drug costs would probably only jump 3 to 4 percent annually.

Senate Majority Leader Pete Knudsen, R-Brigham City, expressed concerns that the short-term savings might actually cost the state more money in the long run, however, because patients are not receiving the best-quality medical treatments.

"You can save money on one side of the fence but spend it on the other side," he said. "Our comfort zone has to be approached on this, because what we do affects the lives of others."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

mike: The basketball's wont be going in the hoop's tonight, everyone know's...

Mom pleads in child beating

Charge her with whatever you like... as long as the punishment is the death...

4A preview: Springville vs. Dixie

really people from dixie? we already beat u with out are best players , but i...

This is a great development resulting from people with different views...

I lost $30,000. Rick's younger brother, took me in a board room at their old...

As most of my colleagues will attest, we try to provide each patient with the...

12 Utes return to Texas

Should be a good game. Utah plays faster than BYU, plus the Utah coaching...

4A football: Mustangs vs. Tbirds

IS "Final Score" completely NUTS! NO WAY does Timpview blow-out MC. If...

Cougars practice with urgency

Life's too tough. We're not good enough. Never will be. Let's quit. Is this...

"IN fact it can be argued any activity by the government that is NOT about...

Advertisements
Advertisement