Readers talk divinity

Divine design and creationism should be taught in public schools — as soon as teaching evolution is mandatory in Sunday School.

Julene Fisher

West Valley City

---

It is a fact that life evolves, but that doesn't mean all life descended from single-celled organisms.

Ryan Larsen

Salt Lake City

---

From Sen. Chris Buttars' comments, am I to understand we need to be mindful of believers' feelings but should care less about atheists? What a Christ-like attitude!

Amy Bjorge

Taylorsville

---

There are many evidences in pure science that can only be explained as miracles — such as the constancy of the speed of light. The only logical conclusion is a superior intelligence.

Ruel Clark

Bluffdale

---

Any legislative mandate to teach the "scientific evidence" for intelligent design would translate into a moment of silence.

Frank J. Messina

Logan

---

If Sen. Buttars' proposed legislation is adopted, I want the curriculum to include my beliefs, too. No one religion should steal the show. I know how my God created mankind, and I'm willing to bet it isn't this truth that Sen. Buttars wants to teach.

C.J. Welle

Sandy

---

I find a God who is the originator of self-propelling natural processes, like evolution, much more satisfying than a God who found it necessary to show his imprint via the eubacterial flagellum. As an instructor of evolutionary biology at BYU, I found when students took time to really understand both their science and their religion, the controversy ended.

Jonathon Marshall

Yale University

---

Chance cannot account for the law that reigns in the universe.