From Deseret News archives:

Cedar Hills initiatives are assailed

Residents tell City Council 2 ordinances are exclusionary

Published: Wednesday, June 8, 2005 8:15 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
CEDAR HILLS — Rude and exclusionary.

That's what one man called proposed initiatives that would ban the sale of any alcoholic beverages in Cedar Hills and prohibit most business in the city from operating on Sundays.

Cedar Hills residents showed up at a Tuesday City Council meeting to speak out against two initiatives that will appear on a special-election ballot on June 28.

"These initiatives go too far and should not become part of the city's ordinances," said Gretchen Gordon.

The initiatives are on the ballot because of a citizen petition sponsored by a group called Coalition to Preserve Cedar Hills.

Residents who oppose the initiatives say they would prevent the city from attracting the commercial enterprises needed to build the city's tax base and provide the services people expected to find in Cedar Hills but have been forced to do without.

If passed, the only businesses that could operate on Sunday are emergency services, media outlets, care and lodging facilities and funeral homes.

"It makes good, strong fiscal sense for our community to have a commercial zone," John Ostrom said.

Story continues below
And while their comments brought grumbles and murmurs from some supporters in the crowd, no one who spoke at Tuesday's meeting spoke in support of the proposals.

But underneath the issue of commercial zones and taxes, many residents said there is a larger issue: one group's attempt to legislate morality at the expense of the minority, however small that minority may be.

"I believe these ballot issues infringe on the rights of the minority," Ostrom said.

Jon Woozley maintains citizensofcedarhills.org, a Web site dedicated to the defeat of the two initiatives.

"There is a large consensus among those who aren't members of the predominant religion that we don't want them and are trying to rid ourselves of them," Woozley said.

Many at the meeting identified themselves as members of the predominant religion, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. However, those who spoke said they didn't believe the initiatives are in harmony with their beliefs or the teachings of the LDS Church. Zonda Perry said her initial response to the initiatives was favorable, but she changed her mind when she really thought about it.

"When you stop thinking selfishly, you realize that even though it doesn't affect you, it does affect other members of the community," she said. "I want the people who aren't members of the majority religion to know . . . their rights are just as important (as everyone else's)."


E-mail: jtwitchell@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

when: One family works their butts off and earns $20K in a year, Another...

The more I read your posts the more I realize that you post because everyone...

Bronco, Kyle rubber match

Bronco Mendenhall, after living a full life, died. When he got to heaven,...

I think the $3.50 charge is insane. I doubt it costs that much to print...

Is talking about religion taboo?

well your somewhat right if what you want to do is use your religion like a...

Editorial: Cancer screening

If it is so inexpensive for all these tests why don't people pay for them...

The Aggies never do anything even half way good that they don't rank on UU...

What a sad life to be convicted of child abuse and then be murdered in...

Y.'s Hall, U.'s Dale earn accolades

Zoobs have no room to talk about close wins. "one play different for OU...

3A: Juan Diego's last-gasp play

This last play should have been a penalty. The inside receiver was covered up...

Advertisements