From Deseret News archives:

Land-use debate grows in North S.L.

Published: Thursday, June 2, 2005 1:05 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
NORTH SALT LAKE — Instead of listening to the public, city officials have a history of catering to developers, according to Stan Porter, chairman of the North Salt Lake Planning Commission.

In a controversial debate over 100 acres of foothill open space, that history is repeating itself, he said. Mayor Kay Briggs and the City Council have had several "closed-door" meetings with developers to hear potential sell-prices for the land.

"It would go better if we had public support," Porter said in an interview Wednesday. "We don't know what the public support is."

In an April 29 letter — obtained through an open-records request — Porter asked that Mayor Briggs and the City Council stop meeting with developers. The planning commission should make that contact and advise the City Council, he said.

Porter further wrote that planning for the 100 acres has taken an "ugly course" since Salt Lake City denied a request last year to annex the land into North Salt Lake.

North Salt Lake owns 20 of the contested acres, but 80 are within Salt Lake City's borders. On Tuesday, the Salt Lake City council denied another request to transfer control of the land to North Salt Lake. They also directed staff to change zoning on the land to forbid development.

Story continues below
"It appears that with one of our first real opportunities to do some real planning, the city is going back to a course of planning by developers," wrote Porter.

"It appears to me that both the mayor and City Council have made the decision to skip both many and important steps. It appears that the decision on what is going to take place with the 100 acres will have been decided long before any details are brought for debate to a professional planner, the planning commission, and more importantly the public."

Mayor Briggs denied any suggestions that he and the City Council have bypassed public process. Development plans have never been requested in closed-session, he said.

Also, when the city revised its general plan, an outside planner was hired and public comment was sought, he said. Two weeks ago, the city parks and trails committee held an open house to gather input on the 100 acres and other area projects.

"The only thing we've asked developers to do is determine a value," said Briggs. "We have never met and asked them what they would do."

Legally, a public body can meet in closed-session to discuss lawsuits, personnel issues or the purchase or sale of city-owned property.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Answers for the BCS

Oh please!!! This is the biggest whitewash campaign I have ever seen. The...

Yet another BCS snub of two deserving teams. They should each get to play...

Beck and Rush and all the like misslead becuase they have no problem telling...

Watch out what you say.. the Jazz play NJ in NJ as well as Minnesota again...

Tom says.... "It's never going to be perfect," What?!?! Isn't BYU on a...

"Either bring the troops home as HE PROMISED before the election," You...

Boise State would have handled Iowa. TCU would have spanked Florida....

The CRU scientist admit to tossing out the raw temperature data, keeping only...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

Can't wait for this one in my back yard! If any of you are on the fence,...

I find it disturbing when 4-yr college graduates (in my experiences) CANNOT...

Advertisements