From Deseret News archives:

Some schools to lose millions

28 districts won't get federal funds to aid low-income students

Published: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:48 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Twenty-eight Utah school districts — including San Juan, where one-third of students are considered homeless — are expected to lose $1.3 million in federal money to help low-income students achieve, U.S. Department of Education estimates show.

Meanwhile, the other 12 districts, mainly in urban areas, would split just under $6 million in new Title I school funds. Jordan District, the state's largest, would receive more than a third of the largesse.

The push and pull follows an apparent shift in where low-income residents live, according to 2002 U.S. Census poverty estimates. Title I money follows poverty.

The results will vary district to district. Some are happy to boost Title I schools' programs and give them smaller classes. But some of the ones losing money aren't sure what's next.

"I was kind of shocked . . . and disappointed to see we're losing that kind of money," Uintah District curriculum and instruction director Leonard Sullivan said. "I see it as hurting the kids in our district."

Title I money is used for various purposes, from hiring reading specialists to offering more individualized instruction.

Schools receiving Title I funds are

Story continues below
scrutinized under No Child Left Behind more than well-to-do schools. NCLB sanctions, including inviting parents to transfer their children to higher-performing schools on the districts' dime, only apply to Title I schools that consistently miss the mark.

Twelve Utah districts are expected to receive more Title I money next school year: Washington, Logan, Cache, Murray, Davis, Wasatch, Granite, Salt Lake, Nebo, Alpine and Provo districts, in addition to Jordan, which will receive the $2.15 million largesse.

Jordan District officials, who two years ago juggled $1.3 million in Title I losses, recommend putting the money into its five Title I schools rather than adding more schools to the program. Doing so offers more stability and other potential cost savings, said Brenda Hales, district executive director over curriculum.

"Sanctions and requirements become more and more costly if you don't make adequate yearly progress" under NCLB in a Title I school, Hales said. The law requires 20 percent of the Title I budget to be set aside for sanctions, she said.

"Rather than have watered-down programs, why not have super programs."

Alpine School District, which would receive an extra $880,000 under the new estimates, has similar plans, said Barry Graff, administrator of K-12 educational services. The district has nine Title I schools that have various programs including extended kindergarten. Some stretch school time to cut reading classes in half.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Let's give the Mayor elect a chance, most she can do is raise our taxes.

Real Champions

We were there when REAL played their inaugural game. We were in our living...

Bronco, Kyle rubber match

If we count the coaches who played for BYU versus those who played for Utah,...

And just where is Johnny Harline playing ball these days? He's another...

Is talking about religion taboo?

This man has never spent time in Utah. It is difficult discussing religion...

Now the right wants to blame Clinton? Give it a break. How about Bush for...

Letters: No DUI law is too strict

It's not the drunks fault they get drunk though. They are predisposed to...

That's my brother! He's a hard worker :)

Hall, Johnson matchup key

What has changed from last year? Well, for starters there's the issue of...

These trials will be a great credit to the American way of life and law. Much...

Advertisements