From Deseret News archives:

Are Blue Dogs a solution — or part of larger problem?

Published: Saturday, May 7, 2005 7:56 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Pignanelli: "A complete waste of skin" is how a veteran Washington, D.C., insider describes members of Congress who are conservative Democrats from the West and liberal Republicans from the East. He concludes these representatives must take certain positions to satisfy constituents that inhibit their effectiveness with party colleagues. Congressman Jim Matheson has disabled this curse and successfully participates in federal policy deliberations as co-chairman of the "Blue Dog Coalition."

Geographically distributed from Maine to Hawaii, 35 Democratic congressmen/women meet every Wednesday morning as Blue Dog Democrats to develop moderate and pragmatic solutions to national problems. More importantly, Blue Dogs build the necessary alliances with Republicans to impact legislation. They are not the Clintonian-flavored "New Democrats" (liberal on social issues/centrist on economic matters) but are conservative on fiscal affairs and most maintain anti-gun control, pro-defense and pro-life voting records. Although there are differences (i.e., labor and free-trade issues), the Blue Dogs stick together. "We are the most cohesive caucus in Congress today," observes Matheson. Consequently, the Blue Dogs are often the swing votes on important legislative items and can mediate compromises between the political extremes.

Political pundits have noticed this emergence of power.

Story continues below
Conservative organizations, frustrated with irresponsible Federal budgetary practices, heap praise upon Blue Dog proposals. The Heritage Foundation (whose members, it is rumored, are not allowed to use their left hand or make left-hand turns) complimented the Blue Dogs for articulating a "strong, serious proposal to restrain runaway spending." Even that mercenary of the far right, Paul Weyrich (chairman of the Free Congress Foundation) was forced to endorse common-sense suggestions from these practical Democrats. The Blue Dogs are demanding audits of government agencies, a mandatory roll call vote on legislation exceeding $50 million and elimination of the automatic increases to the national debt without accountability.

Left-wing groups are worried about the Blue Dog influence. Web sites and PACs have been established with the sole purpose to defeat these "problem children" Democrats in primary elections. Obviously, the Blue Dogs are a constant source of irritation to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. However, she still courts the mavericks because she needs their votes and campaign assistance. The Blue Dog PAC raises over $1 million every election cycle to help compatriots.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Love the fact that this championship has the haters all bent outta shape....

Letters: Climate debate over

Global warming has suffered a great set back by the hacking into of E mails...

The picks are all off. All the home teams will win this week. Lions...

Hey "Brick" can you tell me what similarities this movie has with ninja...

Sad that so many who claim to be so right are so easily mislead.

Y. focused on 10-win season

rivals and scout.com are not the be all, end all. As high school seniors eric...

I am very happy with the quality of GOP candidates to go against Bennett. I...

White House defends health bill costs

It's possible betting markers in the on-going global gold roulette turned...

So the Zoobs have gone from the "Quest for perfection" motto to focusing on a...

RSL trades Seitz to Philadelphia

I would be beyond shocked if Ruud ended up in Salt Lake. He is almost as big...

Advertisements