From Deseret News archives:

House to OK film filter

Today's passage likely to shield firm based in S.L.

Published: Monday, April 18, 2005 10:15 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — The U.S. House is expected to give final passage today to a bill that would legalize a technology that filters sex scenes, bad language and violence from commercial DVDs — thereby letting Salt Lake-based ClearPlay Inc. off the legal hook in its long-running battle with the movie industry.

"We would be dropped from the industry's lawsuit" if the bill passes, predicted ClearPlay CEO Bill Aho, who was in the nation's capital Monday for a panel discussion on the rights and wrongs of editing copyrighted movies for objectionable content.

The Family Movie Act passed the House last year but got sidetracked in the last-minute shuffle at the end of the session. This year, the Senate has already passed the bill, sponsored in the past by Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, who predicted Monday that it will pass easily today.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, is a co-sponsor, and Rep. Chris Cannon, R-Utah, has been a co-sponsor of the House version in the past.

Passage of the bill would likely not affect other Utah-based companies that alter movie content for objectionable materials, like Pleasant Grove-based Cleanflicks Media. That firm uses an editing process and is also named in an industry lawsuit naming eight movie-sanitizing companies.

Story continues below
Cleanflicks CEO Ray Lines, Smith and Aho squared off Monday against Marshall Herskovitz, a movie director and producer whose credits include "Traffic" and "The Last Samurai," and Marjorie Heins, an intellectual property rights expert and free expression advocate.

The practice of creating "family friendly" versions of movies has grown in popularity among parents wanting to better control the content of movies their kids are watching, but it generates passions on both sides of the heated debate.

The fight between the movie industry and the sanitizers is likely not going to go away because Congress passed a bill. At issue is a fundamental right of parents to decide what their children see versus the rights of those who create an artistic product to see the integrity of their work maintained.

"It is the right of parents to decide what is best for their children to see," Smith said, likening the filtering technology to shielding your child's eyes from something you don't want him to see.

ClearPlay would fall under the scope of the new legislation that specifically mentions filtering devices as opposed to editing, and even the bill's supporters admitted it would benefit only one company — ClearPlay —currently offering the modified movies.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Corroon a step closer to governor

Am I the only person that thinks those numbers look all BUT encouraging for...

Thank you, it's very nice to see an article in a conservative publication...

Cougs begin bowl preparations

Once again, on the national stage, BYU embarassed both the yewtie fans and...

Max Hall issues apology

So why wouldn't the Ute fans get over it and very quickly. Aren't they,...

Max Hall issues apology

I have read the comments above. Some of them show ignorant minds using slang...

Abraham Lincoln was never a slave yet he had compassion and helped abolish...

*** "Muslim nations are mounting a campaign to create an international treaty...

Max Hall issues apology

Judging from U fans reactions on here, they are just as mad at his apology as...

I believe the truth will come someday. Our sister was killed 25 years ago in...

Max Hall issues apology

Nice apology where you talk only about yourself and restate all the things...

Advertisements