From Deseret News archives:

Vast 'oil' reserves in Utah may tempt feds to help out

Published: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:52 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — Utah, Colorado and Wyoming sit on a massive fortune in untapped oil — maybe more oil than in the Middle East — if they could just figure out a way to harvest it.

And with crude oil hovering above $50 a barrel, Congress is now showing signs it may be willing to help.

On Tuesday, the Senate Energy Committee held hearings on the vast reserves of oil found in tar sands and oil shale located in eastern Utah, western Colorado and southern Wyoming. The amounts of oil, said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, "are mind boggling. Who would have guessed that in just Colorado and Utah, there is more recoverable oil than in the Middle East, except we don't count it among our nation's oil reserves because it is not yet being developed commercially."

And therein lies the rub. The technology to recover oil from tar sands and oil shale is costly, and it just wasn't justified when oil was $30 or even $40 a barrel.

But with oil prices expected to remain above $50 a barrel for the foreseeable future, a lot of people in the oil industry want to revisit what could become a huge financial windfall for Utah and its neighbors to the east.

Story continues below
"If we can get it out, it will be a huge resource for the United States and a significant industry for the two states," said Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah. "But getting it out at an economic level is a problem."

On one hand it will cost billions to develop and implement the technology. And there also is a problem in that the oil shale and tar sands are located in a portion of eastern Utah coveted by conservationists for its wilderness qualities.

"The wilderness advocates will say, 'Over my dead body.' But it looks like oil prices are going to stay above $50 a barrel, and I could see people moving into this business in a big way," Bennett said.

Congress could be the wild card when it comes to defraying the cost of jump-starting oil shale and tar sands oil production. If Congress were to infuse massive amounts of research capital into production through the Department of Energy, the United States could conceivably generate enough oil to wean itself from foreign oil.

"If there is a federal role, it is in the investment into research to make it happen," said Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, who sits on the House Science Subcommittee that would need to approve research and development funding. "Right now, the technology is not there."

Hatch, who testified at Tuesday's hearing, pointed out that Canada has invested heavily in tar sands technology to reap oil from Alberta. And it has paid off.

Recent comments

Bakken has 504 BBOE in various Williston Basin, ND locations. A...

Jim | Aug. 16, 2009 at 12:13 a.m.

im not in full understanding of the whole oil business. But dont you...

kasey | Nov. 24, 2008 at 8:17 p.m.

The Oil-Sand Industry has been a target for Scams whereby some...

Scam-it | July 10, 2008 at 9:34 p.m.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Way to go Utah! You're finally number 1 in something other than prescription...

Expect epic clash on the line

about the BYU player that transferred to the U? It raised the average GPA of...

'Old Dogs' lacks any bite of comedy

That a Disney movie starring John Travolta and Robin Williams wouldn't be...

And he said that it was his freedom of artistic expression. Gee Lamby you...

@ HaHa.....please don't repeat the silly mantra that the SEC is soooo good...

Wandrew, This is just one more delay and obfuscate tactic used by the flds....

BYU would like friendlier rivalry

I don't know for certain, but I think the enrollment at the U is more like...

Read the article in USA TODAY. The national rating was 0.9.

Letters: Trump card for believers

2:41 p.m. Why would I care if there were a aymbol of Wican or Satanism or...

Dale the Chipmunk is a fictional character. So, who is the confused individual?

Advertisements