From Deseret News archives:

Experts clash on nuclear waste

They disagree on how to analyze safety of storage

Published: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:28 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The National Academy of Sciences and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission disagree on how to analyze the safety of nuclear waste storage facilities in case of terrorist attack.

The matter takes on special urgency for Utahns because the NRC is considering a request to license Private Fuel Storage to build a storage facility for the country's nuclear power plant wastes in Skull Valley, Tooele County.

In February, the commission's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board gave preliminary approval to the facility. The NRC itself has not yet acted, and a state appeal of the board decision is set for hearing on April 6.

Meanwhile, the NRC disagrees with the National Academy of Sciences on how to assess danger from terrorist attacks against stored nuclear waste.

The NAS is an organization of distinguished scholars, chartered by Congress in 1863 to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. The NRC is the federal agency regulating nuclear matters.

Congress had asked the academy to study "the safety and security of commercial spent nuclear fuel storage," as outlined in a March 14 cover letter from NRC Chairman Nils J. Diaz to Congress.

Story continues below
The academy produced the study, which has not yet been made public, and sent it to Congress. In response, a joint congressional report indicated members of Congress expected the NRC to improve its analysis.

The NRC responded with a document, "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report to Congress on the National Academy of Sciences Study on the Safety and Security of Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage."

Diaz's cover letter and the report are posted on the NRC Web site, www.nrc.gov. Once at the site, click on "Web-based ADAMS" and then "Begin ADAMS Search," then search under the heading "G20050024."

Activists concerned about the safety of nuclear power have complained about the fact that the NAS study has not yet been released. Congress commissioned that study about 18 months ago because lawmakers were not fully confident the NRC was covering all the bases, said David Lochbaum, a nuclear safety engineer with the group Union of Concerned Scientists.

While the report itself is still classified, the NRC has provided a peek at parts of it through its public response.

In 2002, NRC initiated a classified program about withstanding terrorist attacks, says the report.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

I find it strange when folks suggest that Atheism is a religion of its own....

Would you want to deprive people of all their pet lizards, pet birds, and all...

To: Tim D. | 5:21 a.m. Dec. 3, 2009 You said, "I have one BIG hang up with...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

"Light travels faster than sound, which is why someone may appear bright...

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

I agree, John. And Aaron, it means know what you're talking about before you...

HD helped The mtn. immensely

Todd Christensen is a horrible announcer. It has nothing and everything to do...

"From the sounds of the victim, it seems like he would have wanted others to...

My grandfathers, both of them, were sent to Stalin's camps on a false...

You said, "...Where did He [Christ] say to petition Ceasar to increase taxes...

The host committee will be asked to raise more than $60 million if the...

Advertisements