From Deseret News archives:

Lobbying loophole lets some avoid list

Lawmakers pay enough to keep gifts under $50

Published: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:46 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Lobbyists spent tens of thousands of dollars entertaining legislators in the recently completed 2005 Legislature, new lobbyist reports show.

But there's a new twist in the gift-giving and gift-taking: During an annual St. George post-legislative weekend, some of the legislators who attended the golfing trip picked up part of their green fees — just enough out-of-pocket expenses so lobbyists don't have to list the legislators' names on their reports.

Several lobbyists who went on the March 3-5 weekend list green fees paid at $49.99.

Said one of the lobbyists: "You can't get a round of golf" for $49.99 at Washington County courses. And some of the legislators golfing with the lobbyists paid the difference so that the lawmakers didn't have to accept a $50 gift.

State law says if a registered lobbyist spends more than $50 a day on a legislator or executive branch employee, the gift-taker's name must be listed on the report.

Did the lobbyists pay $49.99 so the lawmakers' name wouldn't be listed?

Story continues below
Robin Riggs, a well-known lobbyist and former Gov. Mike Leavitt's legal counsel, confirmed that the lawmakers paid part of the fees to keep their names off the report. Riggs is now legal counsel for the Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce and handles a few private clients as well.

A Senate committee this past session killed a bill that would have lowered the legislator-naming gift threshold to $10. And a Deseret Morning News/KSL-TV poll by Dan Jones & Associates found in January that 81 percent of Utahns want lobbyists' gifts to lawmakers banned altogether.

Riggs reported spending more than $441 on breakfasts, lunches and golf games for lawmakers — but never exceeding the $50 limit. According to Riggs' report, he spent $49.99 on golf in St. George on March 3 and again on March 4.

Having legislators pick up part of their round of golf or expensive dinner is a new twist in what has become over the past decade the game of lobbyists entertaining some legislators without having to disclose the gift-takers' names.

Several years ago it was common practice for some lobbyists, working together, to split the cost of a Jazz ticket or round of golf, each taking half or a third of the cost to get each lobbyists' share under $50, and thus the legislator's name wouldn't be listed.

Legislators themselves changed lobbyist reporting rules to get around that "trick," as one legislator called it.

But now, if a legislator is willing to kick in some cash himself, there's another way around the naming law.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

watch out for next year for sure, the negatives are just closet (and...

And something else, I generally follow players from the state schools when...

I could care less that Max Hall said what he did. The feeling is mutual BYU...

BYU is champion of the state

Dear Max, probably could have done without that comment. Probably would've...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

As a Utah fan, let me first say congratulations to Max Hall, the Cougars, and...

Geno's and Pat's are good.. but, they are mostly for tourists, the real...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

(You even got a middle initial... how's that for 'ya Max) It's nice to see...

Air Up There, The

Even today, I still cannot get enough of this movie or Charles Gitonga Maina....

Cougars beat Utes in overtime

...disappointed with Max Hall's comments that he hates everything about UofU....

Over the last few days I read comments of people complaining about tasteless...

Advertisements