From Deseret News archives:

Too much hysteria over nuclear waste, Utah physicist says

Published: Sunday, March 6, 2005 11:50 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Blaine Howard isn't the kind of man to say I told you so. So when he heard the latest in the long-running controversy regarding locating a nuclear waste facility on Goshute Indian land in Utah's west desert — namely, that a Nuclear Regulatory Commission board did not bow to political and public pressure and scuttle the proposal on the grounds that it is unsafe — he did not get all smug about being right.

But the retired health physicist does admit that, "my reaction was one of a relief."

As I have stated in this column on numerous previous occasions, Howard, who served as the state of Utah's health physicist for 18 years in the 1970s and 1980s and has degrees from Ricks, New York University and BYU, has no personal stake in the business of dumping nuclear waste. Whether or not spent nuclear rods are transported to Utah is not his agenda.

What is his agenda is educating Utahns that it is not dangerous to our health if nuclear waste is transported here.

That and letting us know his belief that a little radiation could actually raise our average life span by a few more years and reduce our risk of contracting cancer.

"It's not that the material they're talking about transporting isn't dangerous if it's not handled properly," says Blaine. "But precautions have been taken to ensure it is safe. The citizens of the state of Utah could not possibly get more than a trivial amount of radiation from the cannisters the way they're packaged. The regulatory agency knows this."

Story continues below
As for that trivial amount of radiation that could get into our air supply, Blaine's educated opinion, after a lifetime immersed in the field, is that it would do us all a lot of good.

He cites a number of statistical studies — one in Taiwan, another in France, another dealing with shipyard workers — that reveal that people exposed to low amounts of radiation have significantly lower mortality rates and cancer rates. In the shipyard case, more than 38,000 workers who dealt regularly with small amounts of radiation were compared with a similar number of workers not in regular contact with nuclear material. Those exposed to the radiation had a mortality rate more than 20 percent lower and a cancer rate 15 percent less.

There are spas in places such as the Austrian Alps, the Czech Republic and the Canadian Rockies where people pay to immerse themselves in increased alpha particles in the belief it will improve their health.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Congrats.....very good first year and looks promising for next. Takes time...

"Some men want to marry their sisters. Some men want to marry other men. As...

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

Why attack Glenn Beck, it doesn't make any sense. Why do it unless you have...

Snow hopes to snap bowl game skid

Snow wins 41-37!!!!!!!! Go Badgers!

To: re: MoJules | 9:43 a.m. Dec. 3, 2009 I'm not even going to TRY to...

Will Harpring be missed?

I'll miss Harpring, he was a true BB player with heart and soul. He was a...

Jazz outrun Pacers

Jazz fans were booing the Pacers and the officials. That hurt their feelings...

Utah's Wynn healing up

utah lost more contributive players that meant more to the team. Brian...

If Mr."the truth" wants quick decisions then he should employ the use of the...

Remember that Christ was not born on Dec. 25th, He was born in April. The...

Advertisements