From Deseret News archives:

Citizen initiatives will have to include a price tag

Legislators can repeal laws with too hefty a price tag

Published: Wednesday, March 2, 2005 11:12 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Citizen initiatives seeking voter support now will have to include a price tag before nonlegislators can act as de facto lawmakers.

Legislative leaders passed a bill in the final hours of this year's session that requires full disclosure of all financial ramifications of initiatives. The information must appear on the signature petition sheet as well as on the ballot. The measure will give legislators more leeway to repeal an initiative law if the fiscal impact is greater than expected.

"It's a way to strengthen the integrity of the initiative process," said Rep. Greg Hughes, R-Provo. "The financial ramifications ought to be known to anyone who signs (a petition.)"

The Governor's Office of Planning and Budget will prepare the initial fiscal impact statement on an initiative and will be responsible for creating a final dollar figure after an initiative passes.

If that final number is more than 15 percent higher than the initial estimate, the Legislature has the authority to nix the initiative-driven legislation.

The original version of HB142 also required fluoride petitions to advertise fiscal ramifications, but a Senate amendment earlier this week removed the mention of fluoride from the bill.

Story continues below
Hughes said that the catalyst for his bill was an open space bond proposal that gathered nearly 130,000 signatures supporting Initiative 1 last fall. While the petition touted clean air and open space, Hughes said, many petition signers were unaware that it had a price tag of $150 million in state debt and a .05-cent sales tax increase.

An informal survey by the Utah Farm Bureau Federation of 300 petition signers found that only about 3 percent of them knew they were signing up for increased taxes and a higher state debt burden.

"It's intuitive when you get a clipboard with a vague, generally agreeable concept, you would sign it," Hughes said. "That's what's happening in our initiative process right now. What is lost to many citizens is the cost."

A second initiative bill also passed by the Legislature this session aims to make it easier to verify signatures on petitions, which was also a problem with the open space initiative last fall.

Sen. Beverly Evans, R-Altamont, sponsor of SB11, said it gives petition signers the option of providing their birth date and address along with their names on a petition. If a name doesn't exactly match voter registration information, the added information "allows clerks more flexibility to go back and verify signatures," Evans said.


E-mail: estewart@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Perhaps Hall isn't the greatest quarterback ever, but he is a solid...

Letters: Sodom and Gomorrah

So, I suppose we can ignore Genesis 19 that clearly states at least one other...

Let the haters talk. Go RSL!!!!

TCU is playing like the national champ. I think they are better right now...

TCU 55, Utah 28

spoutin off about the UTES loss when they ought to be "shut" for their...

To have students write on something they probably no little about does not...

Letters: Sodom and Gomorrah

When did the definition of ‘bigot’ change from prejudice...

Johnson fired up to burn old team

I loved Clint's reaction to his PK after Blanco's fist pump.

... the defense gave up "only" 48 points (pick six in 2nd qtr). Another 14...

The reason BYU is still ranked after two beatings at home is because they...

Advertisements
Advertisement