From Deseret News archives:

Moab tailings could wash into Colorado River

A matter of when, not if, U. professor says of uranium-mining waste

Published: Wednesday, March 2, 2005 9:31 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
If the Moab uranium tailings pile stays where it is, eventually a big flood will wash it into the Colorado River.

"Not could. It will happen. It's just a matter of when," says one of the authors of a report on the subject, D. Kip Solomon, a University of Utah professor of geology and geophysics.

Even if no giant flood hits in the near future, radioactive and chemical contamination apparently has leached from it and migrated under the river. On the other side of the Colorado are a nature preserve and the city of Moab.

About 11.9 million tons of uranium tailings and contaminated soil were left near the Colorado River, three miles northwest of Moab, when Atlas Minerals Corp. stopped production in 1984. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the wastes cover 130 acres and were placed in an unlined impoundment.

Atlas "placed an interim cover over the tailings pile in 1995," the DOE adds.

The department has been preparing an environmental impact statement about what to do with the tailings, which at the closest point reach to within about 1,000 feet of the river.

Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. recently wrote to the DOE expressing his determination that the pile should be hauled away from the river as soon as possible.

Story continues below
"Recent flooding in the St. George and Santa Clara regions of Utah also demonstrated the swift and immense force of moving water in the desert," he wrote.

Huntsman's concerns are backed by studies, including one published in December 2003 by Solomon and Philip Gardner, a graduate student at the U.

DOE studies found ammonia and uranium in gravel below the Matheson Wetlands Preserve across the river, the researchers wrote.

"The magnitude of these concentrations and the location of the highest values suggest that groundwater from the mill tailings is flowing under the Colorado River and impacting groundwater" beneath the preserve, they added.

"We believe that there are fluids that have migrated underneath the river," Solomon said in a telephone interview.

Contrary to earlier expectations of the DOE, the river was not a barrier to the flow. A lot of contaminated fluids are discharging into the Colorado, he added. But some of it goes under the river to the Moab side.

Whether this occurs depends on the amount of water in the river and how much groundwater pumping is going on.

When the uranium mill was working, operators leached out material they needed by pouring fluids on the tailings. This caused material to leak out of the pile.

"They were pushing fluids beneath the river toward Moab," he said. Now that operations have ceased, whether the flow is still occurring "is a little uncertain."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Speaking of lights... I like how the LDS Church has a tradition of lighting...

I used to be a student at BYU-H some years ago and worked at the PCC as a...

Utes fall to Seattle U. at home

in the comment section. You can't write something candid and truthful or...

So what party to you think Palin should associate with? Her own GOP has...

BYU has slim shot at BCS

Yeh Go UTS! Win State! Beat that 5A high school! Go UTS.

4 years in the US Navy and I never saw a sidearm anywhere except for those...

Lampropoulos in Senate race

At least he isn't Sen. Bennett. Anyone at this point would be better than...

BYU ties give Utes an edge

Wide struggles to get 50 yards against the BYU run defense, his little...

Nothing sad here at all. I would rather see this noble ship turned into a...

"RE: MormonDem | 4:27 p.m." said "it does NOT matter how many believe in...

Advertisements