From Deseret News archives:

Court backs church's use of peyote

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005 9:29 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
There is presently a misleading and prejudicial effort among some lawmakers seeking to restrict religious peyote use (HB306). Certain legislators, embarrassingly (for Utah), referred to "peyote puffers" and sarcastically to smoking "the peace pipe" to gain enlightenment. This is either woefully ignorant or evidence of narrow religious parochialism or just plain disrespectful or all of the above. Peyote is ingested orally like other Christian sacraments.

The Utah Supreme Court ruled unanimously last July that the Native American Church had substantial rights under state and federal laws. In paragraphs 30 and 31 of their ruling, they held "that the federal religious peyote exemption found at (state code) 21 C.F.R. � 1307.31 has been incorporated into the Utah Controlled Substances Act. Although the statutory language governing incorporation is ambiguous, we interpret the act in a manner that avoids a conflict with federal law and does not risk depriving the Mooneys of their constitutional rights to due process.

Story continues below
"In interpreting the reach of the federal exemption as incorporated into Utah law, we rely on its plain language, electing not to defer to a contrary interpretation that the state argues has been adopted by the federal DEA. On its face, the exemption applies to members of the Native American Church, without regard to tribal membership. The bona fide religious use of peyote cannot serve as the basis for prosecuting members of the Native American Church under state law." The Utah Supreme Court simply brought the official interpretation of state law into conformity with existing federal law. But now, state officials are fraudulently claiming that Utah is out of conformity with federal law.

The reason that it is false — that HB306 conforms to federal law — is because there is no such federal law. The stunning truth is that the DEA did try to change their rules in 2002, but the new rules were never adopted due to the outcry from the Native American Church. A good many of the 300,000 Native American Church members do not belong to federally recognized tribes nor do they have any Native American blood flowing through their veins. A large percentage of the 300,000 NAC members in the United States and Canada do not belong to U.S. federally recognized tribes.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

BYU/Utah game big

Good luck to both teams and may both teams' fans applaud good plays and think...

Logan aims for impact on Wynn

Waaaah! It's all in fun. If you are looking to be offended, you will be...

Letters: Selfish agendas

People are so childish and apparently ignorant that they will sign up the...

Thanks to the Deseret News for posting this each year. It is a great service...

Logan aims for impact on Wynn

As much as some Utah fans would like to think so, Utah isn't nearly as good...

Hey Anonymous~ If you were active LDS you would know that hundreds, if not...

Smith--what do you have against libraries? Have you been in the Farmington...

Could I really the first person to comment on this story? Booz really D-will...

Cougs to host Weber St.

Bub, wow that was quaint. Is the Mtn. still broadcasting in Standard Def,...

Is that a word? See the "uneducated" posts in other articles. Exhibit B

Advertisements