From Deseret News archives:

Court backs church's use of peyote

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2005 9:29 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
There is presently a misleading and prejudicial effort among some lawmakers seeking to restrict religious peyote use (HB306). Certain legislators, embarrassingly (for Utah), referred to "peyote puffers" and sarcastically to smoking "the peace pipe" to gain enlightenment. This is either woefully ignorant or evidence of narrow religious parochialism or just plain disrespectful or all of the above. Peyote is ingested orally like other Christian sacraments.

The Utah Supreme Court ruled unanimously last July that the Native American Church had substantial rights under state and federal laws. In paragraphs 30 and 31 of their ruling, they held "that the federal religious peyote exemption found at (state code) 21 C.F.R. � 1307.31 has been incorporated into the Utah Controlled Substances Act. Although the statutory language governing incorporation is ambiguous, we interpret the act in a manner that avoids a conflict with federal law and does not risk depriving the Mooneys of their constitutional rights to due process.

Story continues below
"In interpreting the reach of the federal exemption as incorporated into Utah law, we rely on its plain language, electing not to defer to a contrary interpretation that the state argues has been adopted by the federal DEA. On its face, the exemption applies to members of the Native American Church, without regard to tribal membership. The bona fide religious use of peyote cannot serve as the basis for prosecuting members of the Native American Church under state law." The Utah Supreme Court simply brought the official interpretation of state law into conformity with existing federal law. But now, state officials are fraudulently claiming that Utah is out of conformity with federal law.

The reason that it is false — that HB306 conforms to federal law — is because there is no such federal law. The stunning truth is that the DEA did try to change their rules in 2002, but the new rules were never adopted due to the outcry from the Native American Church. A good many of the 300,000 Native American Church members do not belong to federally recognized tribes nor do they have any Native American blood flowing through their veins. A large percentage of the 300,000 NAC members in the United States and Canada do not belong to U.S. federally recognized tribes.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hey, if it hadn't been for BYU and a few others who rose out of obscurity to...

Ya I agree with the Beaver fan, Keddington was a beast, I think anyone who...

It is disturbing that someone would use religion to pray on young girls....

tcu has the speed size and power to compete in any other conf. its to bad...

HE WITHOUT SIN CAN CAST THE FIRST STONE

Apparently, the Deseret News is squeamish and I don't blame them for...

Dick ... isn't 'poor judgement' the equivalent of 'poor decision'? Max...

Perfect, spot on comments from Coach Mendenall and spot on comments from Jan...

Revive full food tax?

Just how do you think most other states fund their education? Right they have...

You cant handle the truth. Just keep getting your pre-packaged lies from the...

Advertisements