From Deseret News archives:

Repeal of illegal-alien tuition law to get further study

Published: Friday, Feb. 11, 2005 8:58 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
With a discussion resembling courtroom banter and sidetracks into U.S. Immigration law and college budget requests, a House committee sent to interim study a bill that would eliminate in-state college tuition eligibility for children of undocumented immigrants.

The action followed dueling legal opinions over whether Utah's current law conflicts with federal law.

"We've got so many questions before us, I don't see how any of us could possibly vote," said Rep. Jim Ferrin, R-Orem. "Let us really understand as policymakers what the issues are and make an informed decision on it next year."

The House Education Standing Committee agreed in an 8-6 vote.

HB239, sponsored by Rep. Glenn Donnelson, R-North Ogden, sought to repeal a 2002 law allowing in-state tuition for undocumented high school graduates who have attended a Utah high school three years. It's his second attempt to repeal the law carried by Rep. Dave Ure, R-Kamas.

"It is not an illegal alien bill but a procedures bill," Donnelson said.

Donnelson was flanked by Kris Kobach, a professor at the University of Missouri at Kansas City law school who worked for the U.S. Department of Justice. Kobach said Utah's law conflicts with federal law saying undocumented immigrants cannot receive tuition breaks that wouldn't apply to any other U.S. citizen.

Story continues below
"Utah is currently exposed to significant legal liability in this matter," including reimbursing out-of-staters if the courts decide, Kobach said.

The statement intrigued some committee members. Rep. Steve Urquhart, R-St. George and a lands attorney, noted lawmakers passed the 2002 law believing the federal law in question would alter under efforts led by some in Utah's congressional delegation.

"I think federal immigration policy is really crummy," Urquhart said. "Nonetheless, the law is what it is at the federal level. I think we need to adhere to it."

But others asked to hear first from Utah attorneys before acting.

"You've heard from the plaintiff's attorney. Is that the whole story? (Should you) change the law based on one person?" said Rich Kendell, commissioner of the Utah System of Higher Education.

Utah Assistant Attorney General William Evans, summoned to address the matter mid-discussion, analyzed the state and federal law in 2002 at the request of the University of Utah. He said state law is solid because it is not necessarily directed at undocumented immigrants.

"On its face, that part of the provision has . . . been available to anyone," Evans said. "It does not contradict the federal law . . . and has been applied as far as I know, neutrally."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Treat teachers with respect, trust

RE: @ Brother Chuck Schroeder | 9:42 a.m. Nov. 23, 2009 Brother Churck,...

To "Dems not in trouble | 10:23 a.m." what do you think is going to happen to...

He was aquitted of kidnapping. IE there was no proof that he kidnapped...

Benefits lost over Facebook photo

That is the question--How did Facebook get on her site to view her photos? A...

The LDS Church did not contribute to the so called in correct ads. I guess...

I'll be there with my kids! Way to go RSL!

Hall, Johnson matchup key

I hear that Utah's cheerleaders have been working out for this game . . ....

Bronco, Kyle rubber match

Didn't BYU have those same advantages over FSU? Didn't seem to help much as...

Utah Rep. Carl Wimmer bills

Wimmer is the least effective member of the legislature. I guess some people...

Seer stones are an integral part of Mormonism for the seem reason that skin...

Advertisements