From Deseret News archives:

Duo both fear red ink

Bishop and Matheson side together on budget

Published: Sunday, Feb. 6, 2005 11:20 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
WASHINGTON — Utah is the reddest of red states, one that takes pride in its fiscal responsibility and balanced budgets.

But it seems Congress is more about red ink these days, and that has two Utah congressmen — Rep. Rob Bishop, a Republican who sides with the conservative wing of the GOP, and Rep. Jim Matheson, a Blue Dog Democrat — singing from the same hymn book.

"It's a very major problem for conservatives in the House," Bishop said. "The last I heard, the (deficit) numbers may be changing. They may actually be bigger than they appear. Whatever they are, if (the deficit) is even one dollar it is too much."

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the federal budget deficit is projected to be $422 billion. But that number does not include the cost of the war in Iraq, which is funded separately, or the cost of Social Security reform proposed by President Bush, because those changes have not yet been enacted.

Nor does it take into account legislation that takes effect this year that reduces the flow of revenue to the government.

"There is no question that the rate of spending has gone up far above the rate of inflation," said Matheson, administration chair-

Story continues below
man for the Blue Dog Coalition of fiscally conservative Democrats. "What concerns me is the lack of willingness (in Congress) to offer any solutions to turn it around."

Democrats, because they are in the minority, can safely sit on the sidelines and take shots at majority Republicans' spending habits. It's what the minority party has always done and it is expected.

But the sidelines are increasingly crowded with conservative Republicans who share the belief that spending has to be reined in.

Bishop, a veteran of the Utah Legislature where lawmakers were required to balance the budget every year, is chagrined by the red ink, but he is also pragmatic. Some of the deficit is caused by federal entitlement programs with built-in increases that have to be funded. Some of it is the post 9/11 security climate and the funding of anti-terrorism efforts at home and abroad.

"No one thinks (we) can balance the budget this year, but there is deep sentiment that we are spending too much and we need to start moving in the direction of turning it around," Bishop said. "We kept entitlement spending to 1 percent growth last time, so we know we can do it."

But do lawmakers have the will? Matheson and Bishop have their doubts, although both hinted that a bipartisan effort could put the heat on leadership in both parties to at least move the deficit discussion to the top of the priority list.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

get the health insurance, oR PAY THE TAX. NOT paying TAXES has always been...

Brewer? You are correct - that is actually Brewer biggest weakness - not his...

Letters: How good is health plan?

Class fear mongering. Grow up!

Saying that either Bingham or Alta will overlook Hunter is ridiculous in...

What a beautiful story and a beautiful girl. I hope that the family does not...

Does Scott really blame the Obama Administration for what happened at Ft....

Does anyone know what offers, if any that Kuresa has at this point? I know he...

TCU's motivation

want a big TCU win because they want the Utes to join them in their...

Oil is a commodity, and prices on almost all commodities have been rising....

To John C. | 2:59 a.m. “When ever a people have tried to set up a...

Advertisements
Advertisement