I find it sad that some people can't accept that Playboy mail coming to their house might be there for a reason. In the article "Playboy ads still angering Utahns" (Jan. 26), mostly women spoke of their disappointment in finding this junk mail addressed to their husbands and teenage sons. Did any of them stop to think that perhaps these males requested (gasp!) such ads? Or that Playboy got the names and addresses from other Web sites? These people need to realize that sometimes, boys will be boys, and live with it.
Laura Wooldridge
Sandy
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich won't...
- Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
- Letter: Utah newspapers need to cover both...
- In our opinion: Editorial: DEA plan to scan...
- In our opinion: Editorial: A study on...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the...
56 - Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Debates should be about finding...
22 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
20 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
19 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
16






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments