The call by Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. to ban importation of Class B and C radioactive waste in Utah may take the sizzle out of what had seemed one of the hottest environmental battles facing the Legislature.

Jason Chaffetz, Huntsman's chief of staff, said in an interview Tuesday that the governor not only would call for the ban, but that it would be supported by the new buyers of Envirocare, the only disposal facility in Utah licensed to handle radioactive waste.

"It should be clear to anyone" who has listened to Huntsman over the last year "that the governor will do all he can to keep these higher level of wastes out of Utah," Chaffetz said.

Envirocare is the West Desert firm that now is licensed to handle Class A wastes — low-level radioactive material, largely contaminated dirt. Envirocare has an application pending to import B and C wastes, "hotter" material but still considered low-level.

"We will prohibit Class B and C wastes in this (legislative) session," Chaffetz said.

And that will be done with the agreement and understanding of Envirocare's new owners, he added.

Envirocare is in the midst of an announced sale to a consortium that includes Steven Creamer, a Salt Lake entrepreneur. Earlier this month, Huntsman was severely criticized for accepting $40,000 in campaign donations from Creamer, and returned the money. Envirocare officials have said they do not intend to import B and C waste.

Creamer said he couldn't comment on the reported agreement.

Under state law, B and C waste cannot be brought into Utah without specific permission of the Legislature and the governor. But activists want more, demanding that Huntsman immediately issue an executive order banning it.

Members of a legislative joint task force on radioactive waste recently voted not to call for a legal ban on B and C. The main argument against a ban, according to Sen. Curtis Bramble, R-Provo, is that it could throw the debates into the courts, should Envirocare object. In the judicial arena, the Legislature could lose control of the matter, he argued.

The reason a suit could be filed is that Envirocare spent a considerable sum pursing a permit under the present setup, and could take legal action if it still wanted to import B and C and the rules were changed while its application was pending.

Without the potential of a legal objection from Envirocare, the decks would be cleared for the Legislature to ban B and C, waste experts have said.