From Deseret News archives:
Modify the Species Act
And yet, it's also hard for Americans, with the value they have always placed on individual initiative and the incentive of private ownership, to argue that it's OK to deprive people of their property to protect an animal, fish or plant.
The Endangered Species Act may have become like the Miranda warning something that time and popular culture has fused with the public's notion of public policy, and which would be almost impossible to change. And yet, it seems reasonable to believe the act could be amended to help property owners without also harming endangered species.
When the Western Governors' Association holds its executive summit early next month, this is scheduled for a prominent spot on the agenda. Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress already are talking about possible changes to the law. One proponent of change, Utah State University professor Randy T. Simmons, was quoted in this newspaper as favoring a plan that would allow landowners to be compensated if they help protect endangered species.
Environmentalists see things differently, of course. There's is not an entirely unreasonable position. Each species is part of an intricate eco-system that sustains life on the planet. When man forces a species into extinction through thoughtless acts, it can reap untold consequences up and down the food chain.
And yet, too often environmentalists act as if it is 1917 again and the Alaska territorial legislature has just posted a bounty on bald eagles because they were seen as threats to the fishing and fox fur industries. No one is considering allowing the type of careless destruction that reduced bald eagles to about 400 breeding pairs, or that nearly destroyed the buffalo.
And yet, there ought to be room for some reasonable tempering of a law that seems capable of summarily robbing people of their land with the state's full consent.
Comments
- Jazz game at a glance 3:00 a.m.
- Real Salt Lake: Game at a glance 3:00 a.m.
- Stanford ends Y's soccer season 2:20 a.m.
- Jazz hope D-Will returns soon 2:19 a.m.
- Snow, SUU lose 2:18 a.m.
- Aggies beat Spartans in snowy Logan 2:17 a.m.
- Toone saves day for Wildcats 2:15 a.m.
- Win in New Mexico good for Y? 2:15 a.m.
- TE George's wife delivers 2:13 a.m.
- Weather, stumble play factor 2:10 a.m.
- Apostle's wife felt comfort in attack
- Can BYU root for (ick) Utah Utes?
- Short-handed Jazz fly past Sixers
- D-Will home for daughter
- Utes excited for 'dream' game
- Bench proves fruitful for Y.
- Crash on snowy road kills woman
- BYU happy to escape with victory
- GameDay in Fort Worth
- Born of water and the spirit
- SLC council OKs gay rights policies
358 - Editorial: Mormons and gay rights
200 - BYU happy to escape with victory
194 - Will state consider gay rights law?
148 - TCU creams U.
134 - Can BYU root for (ick) Utah Utes?
130 - Letters: Strange breed in Utah
129 - Utes remain silent about BCS
120 - Pratt pleads not guilty to sex charges
106 - Celtics crush Jazz
104
Maybe someone out there can help me understand how raising the state...
So Great!!! So Proud - Love RSL - Bring Home The CUP!!!!!
mr cannon's bold assertation that the purpose of the first ammendemnt as...
Great great great game!!!! Nicky Rimando is a god! We're the most complete...
I had the game on DVR and just watched it. That was the most exciting game...
financially cannot this year, but I will watch loyally, how great to hear...
This is hardly surprising. Bennett has a remarkable arrogance which is also...
I guess that is why "they play the game" as Herman Edwards would say.. ...
What was the score of the LSU vs LA tech game? Alot closer than you'd like to...
Has Fedor not said that THIS IS OUR YEAR all year long? Go back and...
This is just a small glimpse of the future with Obamacare: corruption, waste...


You can be the first to comment on this story.