Good luck, Sandy city residents. Riverton sympathizes. I'm afraid you may find that money, real or imaginary, will easily negate promises, master plans or anything that might stand in the way. Elected officials are obligated to represent the best interest of the city. However, in the process, they also feel it their responsibility to define "best interest." You will find that they will more readily represent developers and big boxes because of the carrots they dangle.
You say you may have to resort to your referendum rights. Good luck! Riverton gathered over 5,000 signatures on one referendum and over 3,000 on a second. The problem we encountered was that the special election and ballot title are both set by the City Council. They found that to promote "best interest" they have the authority to merely ignore the referendum.
You may find, as we have, that our great Constitution is powerless to protect itself when elected officials assume the prerogative of interpretation and application.
Wilson Svedin
Riverton
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
- Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich won't...
- John Florez: Let's make education's Common...
- In our opinion: Editorial: DEA plan to scan...
- Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
- Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
- Letter: Utah newspapers need to cover both...
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the...
56 - Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
26 - Letter: Debates should be about finding...
22 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
20 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
19 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
16






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments