From Deseret News archives:

Iranian Americans wary of neocons' heavy-handed ways

Published: Friday, Nov. 19, 2004 11:56 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
With President Bush elected to a second term and the neoconservative architects of the Iraq war firmly in the driver's seat of U.S. foreign policy, Iranian Americans are contemplating a stark choice similar to that faced by Iraqi Americans a few years ago — whether they want to work with Washington to liberate their home country.

Although almost all Iranian Americans want to see democracy flourish in their native land, there are intense and divisive debates on how to achieve this goal and what a future Iranian government should look like. These debates are certain to grow only more intense in the coming months, as Iran's accelerating nuclear program vaults it to the top of the U.S. foreign policy agenda.

The activities of Michael Ledeen, one of the most prominent of the Washington neoconservatives advocating that the United States back a plan to overthrow the mullahs, illustrate some of the complexities of modern-day regime change.

Story continues below
Trained as a historian and now the "Freedom Scholar" at the American Enterprise Institute and a contributing editor of the National Review, Ledeen first came to public prominence during the Reagan administration. While serving as a consultant to national security adviser Robert C. McFarlane, he became entangled in the arms-for-hostages trade that became part of the Iran-Contra scandal. It was Ledeen who brought the U.S. government into contact with the Parisian-based Iranian arms dealer Manucher Ghorbanifar, who claimed he would be able to win the release of U.S. hostages held in Lebanon by the Iranian-backed Hezbollah in exchange for U.S. weapons.

In the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, Ledeen has resumed contact with Ghorbanifar, as he has set about gathering information to lobby the Bush administration, private constituencies and public opinion to back a plan to destabilize the Iranian regime and support dissident forces. In a December 2001 meeting in Rome, first reported in Newsday, Ledeen introduced Ghorbanifar to two Pentagon officials interested in discussing the regime change idea.

In June 2003, one of those Pentagon officials, Harold Rhode, went to meet Ghorbanifar in Paris for further discussions — a meeting the Pentagon originally said was the result of a chance encounter.

On April 21, 2003, in the final days of the major combat operations in Iraq, Ledeen traveled to Los Angeles, where he spoke to a group of about 200 Iranian exiles. The event was organized by the owner of a Los Angeles-based Persian radio station, said to be sympathetic to the monarchists (the people surrounding the late shah's son, Reza Pahlavi, who lives in a Washington suburb).

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

miles aveaged about 9 points last year,not 16

You are wrong, wrong WRONG. What happens to the animals enjoying the air in...

The USU - BYU rivalry is as it should be, intense, crazy, and fun, without...

You should still be against homosexual marriage because it is bad for society...

What is going on in the NBA. NJ fires coach and make GM coach. Could you...

Hate not limited to 1 in-state rivalry

Great game Aggies!

Not a question of competent or incompetent. The guy's possessed.

Not in vain: one nation under God

Patriot, our constitution was created by the delegates to the constitutional...

Aggies shoot past Cougars

I agree with the comments above. What is up with the color change for BYU....

To "Re: Chad and Tim D. | 9:03 a.m." The scriptures doesn't say specifically...

Advertisements