From Deseret News archives:

Nuclear waste back on desert burner

Published: Monday, Nov. 15, 2004 11:17 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The issue of storing Ohio's radioactive waste in Utah's west desert that kicked up a dust storm a year ago is looming on the horizon again.

Envirocare of Utah has been asked by a government contractor to submit proposals for taking two batches of waste from a former Fernald, Ohio, uranium processing plant.

Fluor Fernald, the Department of Energy contractor handling the cleanup of the former atomic bomb fuel plant, is seeking proposals from Envirocare for taking some of the radium-bearing waste stored in three silos on site.

It was a year ago that a divisive debate on how involved Utah should get in the storage of another state's "hot waste" forced the company to back off the pursuit of accepting uranium tailings.

This time, while the waste is well within what Envirocare is permitted to accept, concerns remain.

"We are concerned about the level of heavy metals," said Jason Groenewold, director of the Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah.

"The interesting issue is that Fernald has a dump site on site, but it has decided not to dispose of its waste there, which raises the concern about why the federal government wants to send it here."

Story continues below
Envirocare's senior vice president Tim Barney said the contractor asked for a proposal to take waste from all three silos, but stressed the company is only interested in silo 3, which has material well below the radioactive limits Envirocare is licensed to accept.

"We kind of lost the battle for public opinion on (the other silos) last year, so we're not interested in bringing it to Utah," Barney said.

At one point, the Department of Energy was pursuing shipping 8,890 cubic yards of waste from Ohio to Envirocare. Because the waste was "hotter" than the company's license would allow, a number of options were discussed to overcome the barrier.

A controversial proposal by Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, to reclassify the waste as "commercial," opened the avenue for Envirocare to pursue the disposal contract.

That led the Alliance for Unity, a group of Salt Lake business, civic and religious leaders, to announce its opposition to the plan. A legislative task force also wanted to pursue a ban on accepting the Fernald waste without approval from Utah lawmakers and the governor.

Barney said if Envirocare is successful on this bid, it would entail accepting 5,000 cubic yards of material — in the form of a powdery dirt — that would be buried with 6 feet of clay and covered with 2 feet of rock.


E-mail: amyjoi@desnews.com; lweist@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Bronco, Kyle rubber match

Straight from Wikipedia, who would envy this? The 1984 NCAA Division I-A...

Letters: So long, Oprah

Ralph, how can you criticize something you say you have never seen?

Just wait until the Government money printing machine stops working aka...

The percentage argument does not hold water with me. Are you trying to tell...

Strong work Real! Congratulations! Very well done job to Rimando as well!

The folks of Holladay sound like an elitist group who need to climb down from...

If Hatch doesn't like the bill, why did he walk away? Why didn't he marshall...

Reagan much-beloved in Utah

With Reagan our debt started claiming. The Reagan Administration still holds...

2009 MLS Cup recap

amazing stats. russell was definitely an unlikely hero. anybody know when the...

Bronco, Kyle rubber match

Could be a while before they get a win over BYU. Not happening next year...

Advertisements