From Deseret News archives:

Gay-rights groups pressing forward

Despite passage of Amendment 3, they will continue fight

Published: Wednesday, Nov. 3, 2004 9:32 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Amendment 3 passed with 66 percent of the vote Tuesday, and while those who fought against Utah's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage are disappointed in the election results, they do see a form of victory.

Michael Mitchell, executive director of Equality Utah, said the gay and lesbian community is organized, along with straight allies, like it's never been before, and "we're going absolutely to try to keep active."

In a letter to supporters Wednesday, Scott McCoy, head of the Don't Amend Alliance, which worked to defeat Amendment 3, said the foundation has been set for future efforts.

"We must not lose our momentum or squander the political and community respect we have earned," he said. "We must not let the dialogue be muted."

Mitchell said the attention is shifting to holding Governor-elect Jon Huntsman Jr. to task on his campaign promise to propose some sort of reciprocal beneficiary legislation, and ensuring the amendment is interpreted narrowly.

Mitchell said he also hasn't ruled out the possibility of a lawsuit against the amendment, which also prevents the recognition of any domestic union that is the same or substantially similar to a marriage.

Story continues below
Monte Stewart, co-chairman of Utahns for a Better Tomorrow, which worked to pass the amendment, said the state's position will now be strengthened if its marriage statute is challenged in federal court. He added that he has a "keen interest in a reasonable and sensible application" of Amendment 3.

The amendment's co-sponsor, Sen. Chris Buttars, R-West Jordan, said he'd be willing to consider reciprocal beneficiary legislation, if Huntsman does propose it. Such legislation would provide benefits based on dependency, not a sexual relationship.

Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said he'll work with any lawmaker to craft any such legislation within the amendment's bounds, but said he didn't yet know whether such legislation would be constitutional.

Utah was one of 11 states that passed marriage amendments, and opponents saw their efforts to defeat the measures as a step in a lengthy civil rights struggle. Family values groups, on the other hand, said the election was a moral victory — for marriage and families.

Support for the state amendments ranged from 86 percent in Mississippi to 57 percent in Oregon. Marriage amendments also passed in Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota and Ohio.

Matt Daniels, president of Alliance for Marriage, predicted that the marriage measures are "a prelude to the real battle."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

good to know that obama voted against the war we're winning (iraq) and voted...

Some people can lift themselves up by their own bootstraps, others have no...

Thank you Scott for sending the story. I will share this with the rest of...

Teen shot in scuffle with trooper

This is an unfortunate situation. No one wins. Many lives changed and lessons...

Jazz ready to be without Harpring

When Sloan retires, you could put Matt in his place on the bench with not...

I knew these officers personally, wonderful people!!

Why does it matter what others say? Why do you even listen to them? If...

Whatever Max Hall said about the U of U, it will haunt him for a long time...

2 citations issued at Y.-U. game

The aggies are out in the cold and you hate the only two football teams in...

Ranks of uninsured Utahns to swell

This article isn't accurate. It says COBRA would go away under health care...

Advertisements