From Deseret News archives:

Transit proposal seeks tax hike

Published: Friday, Oct. 29, 2004 10:19 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Wasatch Front's two metropolitan planning organizations presented a plan Wednesday that would raise various taxes and fees to finance $6 billion in statewide transportation needs over the next 10 years.

The proposed tax and fee hikes would cost the average Utah household about $350 a year.

The proposal, submitted jointly by the Wasatch Front Regional Council and Mountainlands Association of Governments, was given to the Utah Legislature's Transportation Planning Task Force. That group will discuss the proposal next week and likely incorporate some or all of it into a bill for consideration by the 2005 Legislature, which convenes in January.

"We're asking the Legislature to carefully examine the state's budget to see if there are revenues that could be redirected to transportation," said Sandy Mayor Tom Dolan, who introduced the funding proposal to the task force on behalf of the WFRC.

"We have a long shopping list for you to choose from."

That list was longer three weeks ago when the WFRC approved a recommendation for tax and fee hikes that would raise more than $23.6 billion for road and transit projects over the next 25 years. But when WFRC and MAG representatives got together earlier this week, they decided to focus on a smaller $6 billion, 10-year plan.

Story continues below
"I don't believe that you as legislators are going to approve a tax package to appropriate approximately $1 billion a year for the next 30 years," Dolan conceded to task force members. "We simply cannot afford to fund every worthy project."

That being said, WFRC believes the $23.6 billion figure represents the state's unfunded transportation needs — including reconstruction of I-15 in Utah and Davis counties, building the Legacy Parkway in southern Davis County, extending the TRAX light-rail system in Salt Lake County and introducing commuter rail service between Weber and Utah counties.

Rural Utah also has maintenance and construction needs that would be paid for through the urban planners' proposal. But because some taxes and fees would be localized in areas of greatest need (the Wasatch Front), rural Utahns likely would pay less than the $350 in annual costs estimated by the two planning groups.

"This is the first time I can remember that the full picture of what we are facing (with regard to transportation needs and funding) has been presented," Rep. John Dougall, R-American Fork, said after the planning groups' presentation.

"Economic development in our future is very dependent upon transportation in any metropolitan area."

Here are some of the funding mechanisms the urban planners have suggested for generating $6 million from 2005-15:

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Ric Birks, left, and Daron Bush pump gas in Highland. Under a proposal, drivers may see a sales tax on gas.

previousnext

Latest comments

Obama going to climate summit

The wheels fell off the global warming truck last week when climategate broke...

BYU has slim shot at BCS

I laughed so hard. I even asked myself...is it spring? Is it summer? It's...

Agreed on the pro-conceal carry comments. Anyone who has that permit has...

Letters: C02 causes warming

The loudest propontents of global warming theory don't walk the walk of...

This is definitely a tragedy, and the mother should be commended for standing...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

Brewer-34min 3 rebounds and 5 points, Mathews 20min 1 rebound & 7 points,...

I agree that the finale was a boring waste of time. I tuned in a half hour...

I'm all with the 16 team playoff, but I don't like the only 2 from one...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

Just some food for thought of how the Jazz salary cap situation may play out....

Emotion is big key for Cougs

Beck threw for 375yds and 4 tds in that game in 2006. Pretty worthy of a cry...

Advertisements