From Deseret News archives:

Waste issue isn't resolved

Published: Sunday, Oct. 24, 2004 7:42 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
A legislative task force didn't recommend an outright ban on radioactive waste, nor has it further opened the door to hotter forms of waste. After extensive study and hearings, the joint task force on Hazardous Waste Regulation and Tax Policy left in place the requirement that the Legislature — in concurrence with the governor — approve the importation of Class B and Class C waste into Utah for disposal purposes.

This requirement is a safety net of sorts. But the panel's refusal to recommend an outright ban on future shipments of certain types of radioactive waste into Utah means the Legislature hasn't heard the end of the waste debate. Sen. Patrice Arent, D-Salt Lake, has vowed to continue to seek a ban. Envirocare, which operates a radioactive waste disposal site in Tooele County, will, unquestionably, continue to champion its right to do business without undue government influence.

The task force split the radioactive baby, so to speak. In adopting a draft report created over the past two years, it recommended more stringent oversight of waste handlers' record keeping and more control over hazardous but non-radioactive waste.

It also recommended that mixed waste received from the federal government should no longer be exempt from state tax. Mixed waste contains hazardous chemical and radioactive elements. Presently, it represents a small part of Envirocare's business.

Story continues below
While activists will argue that the report doesn't go far enough, Envirocare officials say the task force's actions mean higher taxes, tougher regulatory standards and limits on future waste shipments. Stay tuned for future debates on these issues.

Frankly, some of the issues raised during the task force's work — such as a ban tying the hands of future legislatures and whether the state can interfere with interstate commerce — deserve careful consideration. Threats of litigation by the industry were raised, although legislators likely hear such "saber rattling" from any number of interests, depending upon the issue. Such talk cannot be ignored, but it cannot be the overriding concern in public policy making.

The bottom line is the radioactive waste wars live to see another day. Considering the complexity of these issues, that may not be a bad thing.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Strange breed in Utah

And your fountain of wisdom is what, and originates from where?

3A football: Wasatch vs. Juan Diego

Juan Diego wins this game by 4 touchdowns. Wasatch just does not have the...

5A teams best of decade

Remember the theme of this article. Best team of the decade, as in this...

NBA's worry is Donaghy

Robinson's claims would be totally unbelievable if they didn't confirm...

Koerber faces 19 new charges

There are many more publicly known details of this case than are in this...

" G, looks like others are bringing facts to this and you keep providing a...

To An Observer | 4:52 p.m. Merriam-Webster: Socialism: 1 : any of...

PETA targets U. laboratories

"violation of federal guidelines in the treatment of lab mice"? Are you...

Audit calls for end to 'double dipping'

We have a principal at our school who is double dipping. What a great asset...

Once again, correlation vs. causation. Spaniards live longer than...

Advertisements
Advertisement