From Deseret News archives:

Scott Matheson Jr.'s response to Deseret Morning News questionnaire

Published: Friday, Oct. 22, 2004 7:07 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The second sentence of the proposal goes beyond defining marriage and threatens the rights of other domestic relationships, such as hospital visitation and medical decision-making.

The second sentence is ambiguous. It was hastily considered in the final days of the Legislature — not the careful and responsible way most constitutional change occurs in Utah. The Utah Constitutional Revision Commission, on which I served for a number of years, is normally asked to review and study proposed constitutional amendments. In this instance, that important process was ignored.

In addition, the adoption of the second sentence could have a negative impact on Utah's economic development. Almost half of all Fortune 500 companies and a number of Utah businesses now offer health benefits based on domestic relationships. I believe that we can, and should, support traditional marriage in Utah without creating an unfriendly business environment.

Concerns with the second sentence have caused Utah's attorney general, the past two attorneys general, and all of Utah's attorney general candidates to oppose Amendment 3. Gov. Walker also has expressed concerns. As one who has studied and taught constitutional law for many years, I agree with their analysis.

Story continues below
16. Do you favor the open space issue which now also will be on the ballot?

I support the "Open Space" initiative on November's ballot. Based on current patterns, developed land in Salt Lake, Utah, and Davis Counties will grow from 370 square miles (as of 1998) to 695 square miles by the year 2020 — an increase of 88 percent. The growth of developed urban areas along the Wasatch Front has taken place largely by converting agricultural lands into residential and commercial real estate. In Davis County alone, approximately 700 acres of farmland are converted to urban development each year. Development also climbs further and further up our mountain slopes.

Although the state Legislature enacted the Quality Growth Act in 1999 — which was designed to provide planning assistance to local governments, administer the LeRay McAllister Critical Land Conservation Fund, and make recommendations to the legislature on growth issues —funding for open space protection has been limited.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

If the Oly v. Skyline game was a fluke, how do you explain Oly doubling your...

"This problem is a lot worse that what we believed in the beginning.." Sound...

Jazz win 6th in 7 games

Hey back off cowboy he has a right to say what he feels this a jazz fan blog....

I wasn't doggin clemens and eaton. I was just curious who the girls are and...

Keith will make a great judge. He is bright and articulate and has the right...

Joe is my hero. We could only hope to replicate him in other locales.

BYU says Hall incident resolved

I too, am an out of state transplant. I have never heard so many people who...

What a loss for Utah. Judge Bench has quietly and effectively serve Utah in...

Jazz's Matthews draws praise

Tell me the last time ANY NBA player was injured diving on the floor for a...

Max apologized and thats really all he can do, he cant take back the words he...

Advertisements