From Deseret News archives:

Gathering opposes nuclear waste storage

Published: Sunday, Oct. 10, 2004 12:32 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
SKULL VALLEY, Tooele County — Fighting sandstorms, wind and rain, representatives of environmental groups from Utah and other states gathered this weekend on the Goshute Indian Reservation here to oppose plans to store nuclear waste.

Private Fuel Storage (PFS), a corporation that represents eight nuclear utilities, has contracted with the Goshutes to store 40,000 tons of nuclear waste in above ground canisters on the reservation, located about 75 miles southwest of Salt Lake City.

But some tribe members and dozens of environmental groups vehemently oppose bringing waste into the state.

Margene Bullcreek lives on the reservation and has been one of the leaders opposing the waste storage. She said it is important for the public to know there are tribe members who do oppose it and that it is an issue that has divided the tribe.

"PFS is a large corporation targeting our small traditional Native American reservation for its dangerous project, and taking advantage of our sovereignty," Bullcreek said. "Sovereignty isn't selling your heritage to the highest bidder. . . . The dump will threaten our tribe's health, cultural traditions and reservation community life."

But on the flip side, storing the waste could spell economic prosperity for the impoverished reservation.

Story continues below
Aside from money, Pete Lister, coordinator of the Nuclear Free Great Basin Campaign, said it is also a chance for tribe members to assert their rights as Native Americans to use their lands how they see fit.

That view is understandable, Lister said, but the nuclear industry is exploiting that sovereignty and fails to support those who have a spiritual tie to the land.

"People say 'We can get rich off this . . . why is Utah against it?' " Bullcreek said. "But it is poisonous and it's going to affect our small reservation, the only small piece of land that is left for us. We welcome the states' contentions to oppose the waste."

The site would be a "temporary" storage site inasmuch as the contract is for 20 years with an option for renewal. Utah officials and other groups, who are fighting the proposal, are concerned it will become permanent.

"They say it will just be temporary, but there are no plans for an exit strategy, and that should be a red flag for everyone," said Jason Groenewold, director of Healthy Environmental Alliance or Utah (HEAL Utah). "We need to remember and be very clear that once the waste gets here, no one else is going to take it."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Van Gundy marvels over Sloan

Jerry- we've had some great times, the highs and lows and the bitter...

Budget hinges on economic growth

The education budget is staying the same, but there will be 11,000 more kids...

ATK to cut 800 jobs

L-3 Communications in Salt Lake is hiring good people; Engineers, Project...

"Documentaries are great IF and only IF they are made from a completely...

BYU bug to aid in soil cleanup

I hope they develop a "green" organism to eat all the CO2 they are putting...

utah state already has claim to the dark blue. be original. stick with the...

To "Stalwart Sentinel | 1:53 p.m." apparently you are the one with the...

Riverton's defense downs PG

I can say that Riverton out defensed us. They played a complete game. They...

Where are the rest of them? Like region 7?

Mike Davis you are the man, defense, offense you have it all way to go booyah!

Advertisements