From Deseret News archives:

Americans know very little about our politics

Published: Sunday, Oct. 3, 2004 12:00 a.m. MDT
PRINT | FONT + - 
In 1963, President John F. Kennedy told an audience at Vanderbilt University, "The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all."

All I can say is, we must be one insecure nation.

Opinion polls are pretty consistent on this one. As a people, Americans tend to know very little about politics or their own system of government. An essay recently published by the CATO Institute, written by Ilya Somin, an assistant professor of law at George Mason University, brought together results from a lot of different surveys to prove the point. Here's a sampling:

These results are fairly consistent with past surveys. In 2000, the National Election Survey found that only 4 percent could name a second candidate for the House of Representatives from their district, and only 15 percent could name just one. And in 1964, most people believed the Soviet Union was a member of NATO.

So much for government "of the people." Sort of makes you want to change to an aristocracy, or to a government run by a knowledgable few, doesn't it? Given how most readers of this column tend to be better informed than the average, we could form our own little ruling society (so long as I get to be the chairman).

Actually, according to Somin, we're already there. The elite rule in the United States by default. But Somin doesn't blame the voters. He says the problem is a government that has grown so large no lay person can possibly get a handle on it. He outlines this problem impressively. The president's Cabinet contains 15 departments, each with its subdivisions and agencies. The executive branch alone contains 54 regulatory agencies. Who can keep track of it all, let alone understand it and evaluate how well it is being run?

And so, this election season is dominated more by what may or may not have happened 30 or more years ago on a Swift boat in Vietnam or in the National Guard than by specifics about the federal budget. The campaigns are about generalities or vague accusations that one candidate changes his positions, or that we ought to feel safer under one man's leadership than another.

About this ad

View Comments

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.

– About Comments

rss icon

Recommended in Opinion

Story

Social issues of religious liberty, conscience and the definition of marriage have returned to public debate.

Story

Seeking theological underpinning for his drive to raise taxes on the rich, Obama used the highest authority.

Story

An opportunity is now before our lawmakers in their consideration of anti-discrimination legislation.