From Deseret News archives:

Amendment 3 foes unified

But backers vow to launch coordinated effort in October

Published: Sunday, Sept. 26, 2004 11:30 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Don't Amend campaign manager Scott McCoy leads a well-organized and well-financed effort, which is trying to draw attention away from the definition of marriage, by zeroing in on the second sentence of Amendment 3, which would prevent any other union from being given the "same or substantially equivalent legal effect" as a marriage.

Opponents received the unexpected help of GOP Attorney General Mark Shurtleff, when he and other attorney general candidates issued a rare joint statement opposing the amendment because of its second clause.

That more unified message of caution coming from the opposition is starting to wear on Christensen, who authored the amendment.

"(The amendment is) a simple, succinct, two-sentence summary. Is Utah for or against same-sex marriage, is Utah for or against synonyms or substitutions? . . . This amendment freezes in place the law."

Christensen's frustrated tone illustrates the success of Don't Amend's campaign, which has been active throughout the summer.

Amendment opponents are doing exactly what they need to do — raising doubt, said Kelly Patterson, director of Brigham Young University's Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy. And it's not generally clear how voters decide ballot initiatives until the last two weeks before an election, he said.

Story continues below
"If the campaign is done the right way and doesn't create a backlash among voters, it can raise doubts about the wisdom of a certain course of action," he said. "All they need to do is say this isn't the right way to do it. . . . If those scenarios are credible, voters can vote 'no.' "

Paulos said amendment supporters shouldn't allow Don't Amend to put them on the defensive.

"They should just stay on message. We tell our candidates and campaigns all the time, 'Answer the question you want to answer, not the question you're asked.' That's just a level of confidence they need to have."

So far, Don't Amend's fund-raising efforts have dwarfed the amendment's supporters. As of the Sept. 15 filing deadline, Don't Amend had raised a total $535,495, compared to $16,480 raised by the campaigns supporting Amendment 3, according to the State Elections Office.

McCoy said he's gaining support through efforts such as house parties, door-to-door campaigning, telephone banks, and booths at festivals around the state. Don't Amend is also planning a television and radio advertising campaign.

Meanwhile, supporters have been slower to organize. Other than a few political booths, voters have so far heard little from Constitutional Defense of Marriage, which formed in early August, or from Yes! For Marriage, which formed in late July.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image

Sen. Chris Buttars, a leading Amendment 3 proponent, talks with fairgoers Saturday at his re-election booth at the South Jordan Country Festival.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Stop begging the question- there is BEER and other alcohol inside of...

Dr. Oz's words if I am reading them correctly, that acquired immunity to a...

Marriage definitions vary widely

["without religion, marriage would not exist. you can't seperate the two"]...

My brother lived in Toronto for 3 years and has horror stories about Canadian...

Are Ute fans really that sensive, I never would have guessed it... Maybe they...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

Great article. Totally agree. Max has apologized (although it could have...

Ha ha big win against stanford again this year! yup you sure tore it up!...

Utes won't respond to Hall

Very mature. How did you ever think of "Maxipad?" I'll bet all your third...

Oil prices spike

@Nothing New Here: Another good reason to find a new energy source!

U. eyes bowl for redemption

I have been to RES and know for a fact that there is BEER there!!!!!...

Advertisements