From Deseret News archives:

Many Utahns may get new 'reading tax'

Law calls for matching funds from districts

Published: Saturday, May 15, 2004 11:53 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
"They should not be worried," Evans said. "In no way is it the intention of the Legislature to penalize those school districts who at this point cannot fully participate. It's an ongoing program, so they may opt in in a year or two. But it's a partnership, and the school districts must decide when they can participate."

"I think that if a district takes the state money and doesn't raise taxes, the Legislature will review that activity," said Burke Jolley, Jordan District deputy superintendent of business services. "I think their original intent was, we'll provide half the money and you generate your share to improve reading. If you do anything other than that, I think you're inviting additional scrutiny (from) the Legislature."

Conservative lawmakers have complained school leaders want them to raise taxes when they're not willing to do it themselves. In 2000, legislative leaders recommended more money for districts raising property taxes — an idea that died in the ensuing economic downturn.

Supporters of conservative causes such as tax credits for private school tuition also say the state throws money at schools without demanding results.

Overtones of both issues surface in the reading program's political compromise. It requires investment, with state support, and accountability: If tax-raising districts don't meet reading goals in three years, the tax gets axed.

Story continues below
Legislators undoubtedly will keep tabs on the program's results. And they could do the same with districts that raise the tax.

"When the Legislature looks at who may or may not raise the levy, they also need to examine circumstances the district finds itself in, and the relative tax burden those districts are currently imposing on their residents," Ogden said.

North Summit, for instance, is the only district the newspaper contacted that won't try to find matching funds. It just wants the $29,300 base money.

"We just passed a bond, so we're not going to go for the levy," Superintendent Steve Carlsen said. "Going to the people again just wouldn't be fair."


E-mail: jtcook@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Shouting side effects?

Fox has but one goal. To demonize the left by talking about the left again,...

Im apalled at why Billy Phillips is not a member of first team all state....

Hey Max Hall.....did you happen to catch Tim Tebow's post game comments after...

If you are one defending Beck then I guess you can read minds just like he...

He has not abandoned his daughter with a disability. I have known his family...

Letters: Shouting side effects?

The America that voted the neocons out of power last election is not the...

The law doesn't sleep at 1 in the morning. Just because its late, doesn't...

Letters: Applaud 'green people'

I agree with lost in DC that people wlll happily argue that lost in DC is not...

Objective reporting went of style with the Liberal media..doesn't matter what...

Matthews passes new Jazz tests

The Jazz brass sid know what they were doing when they invited Wes to Pre...

Advertisements