From Deseret News archives:

Is Atkins to blame in beef over beef?

Published: Thursday, April 29, 2004 10:10 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Maybe it's all Dr. Atkins' fault.

In the latest episode of weight wars, Chuck-A-Rama, the restaurant chain that has been a big part of the Utah caloric landscape for the past 36 years, explained at a press conference Thursday the difference between a buffet restaurant and an all-you-can-eat restaurant — and publicly apologized to customers Sui Amaama and Isabelle Leota for not making that distinction clear to them a week-and-a-half ago when Amaama was asked to leave the chain's Taylorsville location after he asked for, and was refused, a 12th slice of roast beef.

Reportedly, Amaama and his wife, Isabelle, are on an Atkins-like low-carbohydrate diet, which caused them to favor Chuck-A-Rama's beef over fattening breads, pastries, potatoes and French fries.

But either they did not make that distinction clear to Brad Preece, the Taylorsville Chuck-A-Rama manager who was slicing the beef the fated night in question, or Preece may have had a hard time reconciling the terms "diet" and "12th slice" in the same sentence.

Story continues below
Anyway, since Chuck-A-Rama is a "buffet" as opposed to an "all-you-can-eat," Preece asked the couple, when they balked at his censure, to leave. Isabelle and Sui — after eating half a cow — asked for their money back. Preece refused and the next thing anyone knew, the police were there, and not for dinner but to usher the unhappy customers off the premises.

What they had, was a failure to communicate.


This being America, Isabelle and Sui made their case in the media, including appearances on some national news programs, and cried the "d" word: discrimination.

They claimed Preece was discriminating against them for being Pacific Islander immigrants, not for asking one too many times, "Where's the beef?"

"We want to end the stereotypes that Pacific Islanders eat more than your average customer," Isabelle was quoted in the Salt Lake Tribune.

So they hired a lawyer to defend their right to eat as much beef as they want without discrimination.

For his part, Preece's contention is he was much more worried about his inventory of cow than racial stereotypes. It was a quarter to six at night, the heart of the dinner hour, when Sui asked for slice No. 12. The beef was dwindling fast.

"Race didn't have anything to do with that," said a Chuck-A-Rama spokesperson. "It totally had to do with the fact that you've got a guy carving beef thinking, I don't have eight hours to cook more beef. What he's doing is managing his inventory."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Jazz will have full lineup tonight

Korver is more than just a 3 point shooter. If you are playing the Jazz with...

Look to see who is on the floor at the END of the next three games. Tonight...

I think this was such a great program to implement in this community at...

Not the best intro. Please stop with the Max Hall stuff. He said...

LDS quarterback D-II Heisman nominee

But I had to click on the LDS Newsline tab before this story came up. I...

re: Bubble 2010, here we come! | 3:21 p.m. Dec. 14, 2009 Like one expert...

I don't think it was premeditated. Prolly got into an argument and something...

Just who have you fought to protect so far?

It is for people who do things like this that we NEED the death penalty in...

You sound like a very disgruntled BYU fan who is jealous of BSU's success and...

Advertisements