From Deseret News archives:

Is Atkins to blame in beef over beef?

Published: Thursday, April 29, 2004 10:10 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Maybe it's all Dr. Atkins' fault.

In the latest episode of weight wars, Chuck-A-Rama, the restaurant chain that has been a big part of the Utah caloric landscape for the past 36 years, explained at a press conference Thursday the difference between a buffet restaurant and an all-you-can-eat restaurant — and publicly apologized to customers Sui Amaama and Isabelle Leota for not making that distinction clear to them a week-and-a-half ago when Amaama was asked to leave the chain's Taylorsville location after he asked for, and was refused, a 12th slice of roast beef.

Reportedly, Amaama and his wife, Isabelle, are on an Atkins-like low-carbohydrate diet, which caused them to favor Chuck-A-Rama's beef over fattening breads, pastries, potatoes and French fries.

But either they did not make that distinction clear to Brad Preece, the Taylorsville Chuck-A-Rama manager who was slicing the beef the fated night in question, or Preece may have had a hard time reconciling the terms "diet" and "12th slice" in the same sentence.

Story continues below
Anyway, since Chuck-A-Rama is a "buffet" as opposed to an "all-you-can-eat," Preece asked the couple, when they balked at his censure, to leave. Isabelle and Sui — after eating half a cow — asked for their money back. Preece refused and the next thing anyone knew, the police were there, and not for dinner but to usher the unhappy customers off the premises.

What they had, was a failure to communicate.


This being America, Isabelle and Sui made their case in the media, including appearances on some national news programs, and cried the "d" word: discrimination.

They claimed Preece was discriminating against them for being Pacific Islander immigrants, not for asking one too many times, "Where's the beef?"

"We want to end the stereotypes that Pacific Islanders eat more than your average customer," Isabelle was quoted in the Salt Lake Tribune.

So they hired a lawyer to defend their right to eat as much beef as they want without discrimination.

For his part, Preece's contention is he was much more worried about his inventory of cow than racial stereotypes. It was a quarter to six at night, the heart of the dinner hour, when Sui asked for slice No. 12. The beef was dwindling fast.

"Race didn't have anything to do with that," said a Chuck-A-Rama spokesperson. "It totally had to do with the fact that you've got a guy carving beef thinking, I don't have eight hours to cook more beef. What he's doing is managing his inventory."

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

NO MASS EXPENSIVE DEPORTATION IS NEEDED? E-VERIFY IS VASTLY BECOMING THE...

I believe this, and the next few, will be among the best Y hoops years ever....

Students protest animal testing

How about testing the brain power of the owners who have animals which end up...

I'm a stoked to watch RSL tear these clowns to pieces. BOOYAH!

Boozer is doing great and some people are talking about trading him. He is a...

The US may be number one in gun violence but think how much worse it would be...

"Only that Mendenhall tapped into an important component of his team for the...

Utes turn attention to rivalry

I have been to a couple Utah-BYU games in Provo. Both times, I was subjected...

Are you a little confused today John? First...divorced men being compared to...

Re: Give it a rest Who do you call if you have an emergency on Sunday?

Advertisements