From Deseret News archives:

Living small — Some Utahns discovering the charm of cottages

Published: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:27 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
After all, who wants to clean and heat a bunch of empty bedrooms? Not Mel and Carol Butler, who live in a 4,700-square-foot home that actually felt pretty cozy when all seven kids were around. (In those days, they had an average of 533 square feet per person.) The Butlers want a new home with the same size kitchen and living room, but without all those bedrooms and without a big family room in the basement.

Butler is a real-estate agent. He's learned that not every client wants a smaller house after the kids are gone. Some want the biggest and fanciest place they can afford. Some do go smaller, perhaps to an elegant condo, which can cost more than their house did.

We must remember that humans are not all alike, notes architect Bee Losee, who lives with her husband and two children in a renovated Salt Lake bungalow. "We tend to see ourselves as similar, but if you look at the animal kingdom, we are as different as they," said Losee. "Some of us might be happy in a nest or a hive. Some of us might be happy in a cave. But some of us, for reasons I don't really understand, need something bigger."

As for architect Dave Brems, he's lived in a variety of spaces. A few years ago he was happy in a 1,600-square-foot home in Emigration Canyon. "It was energy efficient and easy to maintain," he says.

Story continues below
Currently, he and his wife and two children are happy in their 3,200-square-foot home. But they've also been happy, for weeks at a time, living on a 26-foot sailboat, sleeping head-to-feet and stuffing their possessions into every available nook.

The Brems recently bought 10 acres of land near Boulder, in Garfield County. It is a beautiful spot that adjoins thousands of acres of public land. It is just too pretty to mar with something big and man-made, Brems feels.

So the retreat he will build on this place will be small, with a big deck. Maybe it will be as large as 600 square feet, he says, but probably more like 400 square feet. Or smaller. Maybe the house will just have a kitchen and a bathroom, 100 square feet in all. Compared to living on a boat, he says, it will feel palatial.


E-mail: susan@desnews.com

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
www.rosschapin .com

Coho Cottage in Washington state is 965 square feet. It is part of the Greenwood Avenue Cottages.

previousnext

Latest comments

"too bad a poor sport, loud mouth has to be the current point of reference...

Letters: 'Selfishness' is motto

Mike RIchards | 3:09 a.m. Dec. 18, 2009 Why do the godless liberals invoke...

Editorial: White House double-talk

I don't think, it's double talk, any more in the White House, in Congress...

Letters: S.L. gym a public option

I go to the Copperview Gym in Midvale, and no one is there, I have the gym to...

Chamber opposes Herbert tax plan

Force businesses to raise the minimum wage? Are we trying to help the...

Wynn took one shot in the Utah vs BYU game and he was looking all day to who...

If you think its about anything but money (either side) then you would be a...

I disagree...Angels in America is misleading, and an attempt to distinguish...

Letters: Judge is a disgrace

Let's organize a public protest and march on federal court and let them know...

Going to another planet to 'mine the ore' Becomes 'one of them' they take him...

Advertisements