From Deseret News archives:

S.L. given a low-risk option on UTOPIA

But council still appears unlikely to give green light

Published: Friday, April 9, 2004 12:11 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Councilmen Dave Buhler and Eric Jergensen are two of those three no votes, and some council members say Van Turner is the third. Turner, for the record, noted: "I need to be swayed a little bit more if I'm going to vote yes."

Turner said the Wexford deal is not an option for him.

"My take is that's too late to worry about it and too late to check into it at this stage," he said. "A city our size doesn't need a private individual to back our backstop."

Buhler and Jergensen say they will vote no on UTOPIA despite the Wexford proposal because the city will still be on the hook to spend some taxpayer monies if UTOPIA doesn't meet expectations.

The latest Wexford deal, according to documents obtained from Salt Lake City, would still require the city to pay the first $1.1 million of any UTOPIA losses, with Wexford picking up the rest of the city's financial commitment during UTOPIA's first 10 years. That financial commitment is a pledge of sales tax revenue of up to $4.1 million yearly for 17 years to pay for UTOPIA's construction costs. That money would only be spent if subscription rates on to the network were less than UTOPIA's estimates. If subscriptions rates met expectations, the city would keep its money and also turn profits that could reach millions annually.

Story continues below
Even Councilman Carlton Christensen, the only council member to say publicly that he will vote in favor of backing UTOPIA, says the Wexford deal would be his "last resort."

Christensen, Buhler and Love agree if the city were to accept an offer from a venture capital firm it should get the best deal possible. Instead of taking Wexford's deal, the city should put out a public request for bid; that way the city might find another firm with an even sweeter offer.

But with less than a week until a state-imposed deadline for Salt Lake City to vote on whether it will financially commit to UTOPIA, time for such a bid process is short.

Christensen, however, said the council could vote to financially back UTOPIA at its Tuesday meeting only on the condition that a private financial backer is involved. Then the city could conduct a two- or three-month bid process to find the best deal.

According to Wexford's Web site, the venture capital firm was formed in 1994 and has invested over $1.5 billion in private investments and has realized over $1.9 billion in proceeds. The company has been known to invest primarily in transportation, technology and natural resource industries.

Morris said he believes Wexford's offer flies in the face of UTOPIA opponents, such as the Utah Taxpayers Association, which said the project was too risky for even private investment.

Amron said his company has done its homework, adding Wexford feels UTOPIA could be the example to other U.S. metropolitan areas.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

Image
Deseret Morning News graphic

previousnext

Latest comments

What a bunch of lies. Wall Street failures didn't plunge America into a...

Gun laws becoming more loose

Surely you don't own more than one pair of shoes, do you? Probably...

Nice try. I never said there weren't good arguments against depleted...

RE: Dennis Look at "list of countries by firearm-related death rate" on...

4A All-State volleyball teams

How come no one explains how these teams are picked? I know a player that 2...

Dr. explains Mitchell review change

I am a-shamed of this Dr Skeem, pronounced scheme by coincidence. She is...

Libs always name call. Thats all they have in their tank. If we can make...

New Irish coach Brian Kelly

for the NCAA to put a ban on coaches' hirings until after the bowls. If that...

I for one do not want to see them get their million dollar bonuses until they...

Waterboard this guy, if he truly does not know. Say your sorry.....

Advertisements