From Deseret News archives:

Illinois lawmaker regrets confusion

LDS resolution meant to bring unity, he says

Published: Friday, April 2, 2004 8:34 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The Illinois lawmaker who took back a legislative apology to members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for their treatment in Nauvoo said Friday he's sorry about the confusion surrounding the change.

"I'm not trying to create controversy here. I'm trying to bring people together," said Illinois Rep. Jack Franks, the sponsor of a resolution that now professes only regret for "the expulsion of the community of Latter-day Saints, a people of hard work and faith."

When the resolution was first approved by the Illinois House on March 24, it also sought "the pardon and forgiveness" of Mormons for the violence that drove them from Nauvoo nearly 160 years ago, including the death of church founder Joseph Smith.

But Thursday, lawmakers passed a new version without that language at Franks' request. He told the Deseret Morning News that he thought the apology had been struck from the original draft of the resolution before it passed the first time.

"I can certainly express regret and let us know we don't feel that way now," said Franks, a Democrat from Woodstock, a community located about 65 miles northwest of Chicago. "But it's not my place to apologize for those actions."

Story continues below
The apology was written by a Chicago alderman, Ed Burke, who was moved to draft the resolution after hearing the Nauvoo story from Gov. Olene Walker's husband, Myron, during a vacation in Deer Valley last year.

Franks said he cut about a third of Burke's draft, including the final paragraph apologizing "for the misguided efforts of our citizens, Chief Executive and the General Assembly" in the expulsion of the Mormons from Nauvoo.

It wasn't until this week — when news of the apology surfaced in Chicago and Salt Lake City — that Franks said he discovered the last paragraph had not been cut. The Illinois House approved the new version without debate.

"I don't think it changes the sentiment at all. Certainly not the intent," Franks said. "The intent is to express regret and honor people. I'm just sorry this has become a bit more convoluted now when it doesn't need to be."

Another sponsor of the resolution — and the brother of Alderman Burke — Rep. Dan Burke, D-Chicago, said he was surprised at the media attention the change in the resolution has received.

Dan Burke said the apology was removed "because in this day of reparations and so forth, we thought it was best to leave it out." He said the concern was not that Mormons might seek compensation from Illinois but that other groups could.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Only the fringe would have a problem with someone like Palin.

Photo: Huntsman starts job in China

"The United States has set up hundreds of military bases in many countries...

@ ROLL OUT THE BARREL: "Roll Out The Barrel” protesteth too much,...

3A: Juan Diego's last-gasp play

since you tvoed the game watch it from beginning to end and youwill see...

You are wrong. We don't ban cars because of drunks and we don't ban guns...

Hall, Johnson matchup key

Wynn has 1 interception. Hall has 14. Stay in school and learn to count...

Public censure is code for the following: 1) Someone at AF read the article...

The MWC are a bunch of clowns. This is the same bunch that gives us the mtn.;...

Two great players from two great teams bringing good attention to our state...

Protests against Phoenix LDS temple

im a strong member of the church. i would like to think this is just a...

Advertisements