From Deseret News archives:

Text of Tenet's remarks at Georgetown

Published: Thursday, Feb. 5, 2004 6:37 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Saddam had recently called together his nuclear weapons committee, irate that Iraq did not yet have a weapon because money was no object and they possessed the scientific know-how. The committee members assured Saddam that once fissile material was in hand, a bomb could be ready in 18 to 24 months. The return of U.N. inspectors would cause minimal disruption because, according to the source, Iraq was expert at denial and deception.

The same source said that Iraq was stockpiling chemical weapons and that equipment to produce insecticides under the oil-for-food program had been diverted to covert chemical weapons production.

The source said that Iraq's weapons of last resort were mobile launchers armed with chemical weapons which would be fired at enemy forces in Israel; that Iraqi scientists were dabbling with biological weapons with limited success, but the quantities were not sufficient to constitute a real weapons program.

A stream of reporting from a different sensitive source with access to senior Iraqi officials said he believed production of chemical and biological weapons was taking place, that biological agents were easy to produce and hide, and that prohibited chemicals were also being produced at dual-use facilities.

The source stated that a senior Iraqi official in Saddam's inner circle believed, as a result of the U.N. inspections, Iraq knew the inspectors' weak points and had to take advantage of them.

The source said that there was an elaborate plan to deceive inspectors and ensure prohibited items would never be found.

Story continues below
Now, did this information make any difference in my thinking? You bet it did.

As this information and other sensitive information came across my desk, it solidified and reinforced the judgments that we had reached in my own view of the danger posed by Saddam Hussein and I conveyed this view to our nation's leaders.

Could I have ignored or dismissed such reports? Absolutely not.

Now, I'm sure you're all asking, "Why haven't we found the weapons?" I've told you the search must continue and it will be difficult.

As David Kay reminded us, the Iraqis systematically destroyed and looted forensic evidence before, during and after the war. We have been faced with organized destruction of documentary and computer evidence in a wide range of offices, laboratories and companies suspected of weapons of mass destruction work. The pattern of these efforts is one of deliberate, rather than random, acts. Iraqis who have volunteered information to us are still being intimidated and attacked.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Answers for the BCS

Oh please!!! This is the biggest whitewash campaign I have ever seen. The...

Yet another BCS snub of two deserving teams. They should each get to play...

Beck and Rush and all the like misslead becuase they have no problem telling...

Watch out what you say.. the Jazz play NJ in NJ as well as Minnesota again...

Tom says.... "It's never going to be perfect," What?!?! Isn't BYU on a...

"Either bring the troops home as HE PROMISED before the election," You...

Boise State would have handled Iowa. TCU would have spanked Florida....

The CRU scientist admit to tossing out the raw temperature data, keeping only...

Utes excited to go to San Diego

Can't wait for this one in my back yard! If any of you are on the fence,...

I find it disturbing when 4-yr college graduates (in my experiences) CANNOT...

Advertisements