From Deseret News archives:

A before-and-after look at intelligence views on Iraq weapons

Published: Thursday, Feb. 5, 2004 6:38 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Prewar views on Iraq's weapons programs, based on Bush administration statements and documents including unclassified information from the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, and CIA Director George Tenet's views on their accuracy today. Tenet spoke Thursday at Georgetown University:

Chemical Weapons:

• Before: Iraq was believed to have stocked up to 500 metric tons of chemical warfare agents. It was also said to have concealed equipment and other items needed for continuing chemical weapons production.

• After: No chemical weapons have been found. Some sources say Iraq was conducting experiments to develop chemical weapons, but no physical evidence has been found. More time is needed to investigate.

Tenet on Thursday: "My provisional bottom line today: Saddam had the intent and capability to quickly convert civilian industry to chemical weapons production. However, we have not yet found the weapons we expected."

Biological Weapons:

Story continues below
• Before: Intelligence agencies believed Iraq had biological weapons and facilities to develop more of them. Among the weapons believed to be in Iraq was anthrax, a deadly germ which could be quickly produced and delivered by bombs, missiles, aerial sprayers or covert operatives. Mobile laboratories were believed to be used for developing biological weapons.

• After: No weapons have been found. Inspectors have found facilities that could be used for biological weapons research and development. Agencies need to learn more about the role played by Iraqi security services, which operated covert labs. There is no consensus about whether trailers located by inspectors were used for biological warfare or the production of hydrogen.

Tenet: "My provisional bottom line today: Iraq intended to develop biological weapons. Clearly, research and development work was under way that would have permitted a rapid shift to agent production if seed stocks were available. But we do not yet know if production took place. And just as clearly, we have not yet found biological weapons."

Nuclear Weapons:

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

You don't get it dude. Mathews could score 0 and get 0 rebounds and still be...

I meant conference championships

In IL you actually pay full tax 6.5% (Plus add ons) on non food items like...

Johnny Miller, I'm dying to hear your thoughts on the recent implosion....

Editorial: Another BCS mess

Where does all of this talk come from that TCU would kill Texas and give...

I meant championships For a team ''Utah'' that has only won five conference...

Thank heaven she and the baby are safe now. Hope that things get better for...

For a team ''Utah'' that has only won five bowl games in 50 years. And lost...

Letters: Publish climate facts

But what is so bad about global warming? Is it really worth spending --oh...

'insane restrictions on folks freedom to drink? It is my own personal...

Advertisements