WASHINGTON Before the great hunt for scapegoats begins, let's look at what David Kay has actually said about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
First, and most trumpeted, he did not find "large stockpiles of newly produced weapons of mass destruction." He did find, as he reported last October, WMD-related activities, from a very active illegal missile program to research and development ("right up until the end") on weaponizing the deadly poison ricin (the stuff found by London police on terrorists last year). He discovered "hundreds of cases" of U.N.-prohibited and illegally concealed activities.
Significant findings, but still a far cry from what the administration had claimed last March. Kay has now offered the most novel and convincing explanation for why U.S. intelligence and, for that matter, U.N. inspectors and the intelligence agencies of every country that mattered had misjudged what Iraq possessed.
It was a combination of Iraqi bluff, deceit and corruption far more bizarre than heretofore suspected. Kay discovered that an increasingly erratic Saddam had taken over personal direction of WMD programs. But because there was no real oversight, the scientists would go to Saddam for money, exaggerate or invent their activities, then pocket the funds.
Scientists were bluffing Saddam. Saddam was bluffing the world. The Iraqis were all bluffing each other. Special Republican Guard commanders had no WMDs, but they told investigators that they were sure that other guard units did. It was this internal disinformation that the whole outside world missed.
Congress needs to find out why, with all our resources, we had not a clue that this was going on. But Kay makes clear that Bush was relying on what the intelligence agencies were telling him. Kay contradicts the reckless Democratic charges that Bush cooked the books.
"All the analysts I have talked to said they never felt pressured on WMD," says Kay.
"Everyone believed that (Iraq) had WMD."
Including the Clinton administration. Kay told The Washington Post that he had found evidence that Saddam had quietly destroyed some biological and chemical weapons in the mid-1990s but never reported it to the United Nations. Which was why Clinton in 1998 declared with great alarm and great confidence that Iraq had huge stockpiles of biological and chemical arms "and some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal."
- Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
- Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich won't...
- Jay Evensen: Graduates, will there be limits...
- In our opinion: Editorial: DEA plan to scan...
- Letter: Obama throws a curveball
- Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the far left
- Letter: Obama shows allegiance to the...
56 - Robert Bennett: It's time to fix our...
35 - Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
35 - Letter: Obama throws a curveball
31 - Thomas Sowell: Raising taxes on rich...
25 - Letter: Senator Orrin Hatch claims to...
22 - Letter: Debates should be about finding...
22 - Letter: Age really matters regarding...
20






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments