From Deseret News archives:

Judge blocks ban on 'screener' copies of films to award voters

Published: Friday, Dec. 5, 2003 11:05 a.m. MST
PRINT | FONT + - 
NEW YORK — In a victory for independent film producers, a federal judge Friday blocked an industry ban on sending advance copies of films to some movie awards voters.

Large movie studios had claimed the ban was critical to stop the explosion of movie piracy. But smaller houses said it limited awards voters' exposure to their movies, hurting their chances for critical buzz and bigger box-office receipts.

U.S. District Judge Michael B. Mukasey sided with the independent producers, granting a temporary restraining order against the ban imposed by the Motion Picture Association of America.

Mukasey said he was swayed by testimony that showed awards are critical to the success of smaller films, which don't have the hefty advertising budget of larger studios. He also said the 14 independent movie studios that brought the case against the MPAA had shown sufficient evidence that the ban violated federal antitrust law, which is designed to encourage competition.

"Plaintiffs have shown they are at risk of loss of revenue as a result of the screener ban," the judge said.

Producer Ted Hope, whose independent films include "The Ice Storm," "In the Bedroom" and this year's critical hit "American Splendor," said the ruling was a victory for movie fans because it would allow smaller-budget pictures to get the acclaim they deserve, and therefore wider release.

"I'm just thrilled," he said.

The Motion Picture Association "will appeal because the impact and growing threat of piracy is real and must be addressed wherever it appears," said a statement by its president, Jack Valenti.

Mukasey heard a full day of testimony in the case on Wednesday, including that of Valenti, who said the ban was justified and important.

"Piracy has become a malignant fungus on the face of our industry, and it's becoming more virulent as we go along," he said.

But the ban also would force voters for some movie awards to attend one-time-only screenings or see movies in theaters, rather than watching at home on their own time.

Smaller movie studios said that meant their films were less likely to be considered for awards.

The major film studios that make up the MPAA agreed to the ban Sept. 30. The trade group said it was concerned that screener copies of movies were finding their way onto the streets for sale as bootleg, or readily available on the Internet in digital form.

Independent film producers spoke out against the ban almost immediately, arguing it would hurt their chances at winning smaller prizes like Screen Actors Guild or Golden Globe awards.

The ban was modified Oct. 23 to allow the 5,600 voters for the Academy Awards, the industry's most important, to receive advance copies of movies up for awards in videotape form, which is more difficult to copy.

But independent producers said they were still harmed because the smaller awards, handed out in the fall and winter, are widely considered to affect which movies Oscar voters consider.

The 14 independent studios argued that the recent films, "Boys Don't Cry," "Gosford Park," "In the Bedroom" and "The Pianist," all lauded at the Oscars, were helped tremendously by receiving earlier, smaller awards.

About this ad

View Comments

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.

– About Comments

rss icon

Recommended in World & Nation

Story

Thousands took to the streets of Athens as Greek unions launched a two-day general strike.

Story

Two explosions targeted security compounds in the Syrian city of Aleppo on Friday.

Story

Mexico could become a world platform for meth production, not just a supplier to the United States.