From Deseret News archives:

Hypothesis on radiation is a waste

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2003 11:21 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Blaine Howard isn't surprised. He passed that stage long ago. But he continues to be disappointed at the abject lack of public understanding regarding the danger of things minimally nuclear.

The 73-year-old retired health physicist could only shake his head as he read his Tuesday morning newspaper and noted that the influential Alliance for Unity has registered its official opposition to the transport of nuclear waste into Utah.

Names like Huntsman, Eccles, Ballard and Niederauer are behind the A-for-U, which lends a huge amount of credibility to whatever the group is for or against — even if, as Blaine suggests, in this case it doesn't know what it's talking about.

To cue up the broken record Blaine has been playing for years, it is his opinion, as well as that of any other credentialed health physicists he associates with, that there is no undue public risk in the transport and storing of low levels of radiation — here or anywhere else.

Of the low-level uranium mill tailings in Ohio that stirred up the latest outcry against nuclear waste coming to the Utah desert, Mr. Howard says, "If my children went out and played in it, I wouldn't be concerned that they would be harmed by the radiation."

And yes, he loves his kids.

Story continues below
At the crux of his reasoning is a scientific belief that the linear non-threshold hypothesis is incorrect.

And what is the linear non-threshold hypothesis? In layman's terms, it is the theory that if a lot of radiation is harmful, then lesser amounts are proportionately harmful.

Blaine says that theory is flawed. In fact, he says, there comes a point when radiation turns the corner and actually becomes beneficial.

As the latest example of that, he points to 1,500 apartments constructed in Taiwan in the early 1980s with steel bars that unknowingly exceeded legal radiation levels. More than 10,000 people lived amid this supposed danger for more than 15 years, and the result, instead of a radiation nightmare, is a rate of cancer 96.5 percent lower for the residents of the apartments than for the Taiwanese population at large.

"It appears that the Taiwan Atomic Energy Council, by failing to 'protect' these people from the harmful effects of radiation, allowed them to receive the beneficial effects of radiation," says Blaine.


Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

You are the reason the republicans lost all power in the last election. I am...

Rather than knocking their heads together, just ignore them.

Letters: Talk-radio swindlers

Under Bush, we can all look forward to military aggression, deregulation of...

run Scott run!!!!

What exactly were Nephite interpreters?

ONe more thing. The use of the word Christ is also the wrong word to use as...

2 more in GOP may challenge Bennett

we have about 2/3 of the US senate as attorneys now. Do we need another one?...

Utah Jazz: Miles has cast removed

It's the Jazz coaching and play.

Letters: Gale's been taken in

I like to think of them as the "Pied Pipers of A.M.-land". Paid well to...

Hunter showed class and discipline when it appeared they were losing it in...

The CBO reported a tort reform would "save" $54 billion over 10 yrs. Many...

Advertisements
Advertisement